-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
modify contract for deploying native minter later #79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Claude finished @tac0turtle's task —— View job Pull Request ReviewI've completed a thorough review of this PR which modifies the FeeVault contract to allow deferred HypNativeMinter deployment. Here's my comprehensive feedback: Todo List:
Security Concerns🔴 Critical: Mutable HypNativeMinter AddressLocation: The most significant security concern is that Risk: A compromised or malicious owner could redirect bridged funds to an attacker-controlled minter. Recommendation: If the intent is to set the minter only once post-deployment, add a check: function setHypNativeMinter(address _hypNativeMinter) external onlyOwner {
require(address(hypNativeMinter) == address(0), "FeeVault: minter already set");
require(_hypNativeMinter != address(0), "FeeVault: zero address");
hypNativeMinter = IHypNativeMinter(_hypNativeMinter);
emit HypNativeMinterUpdated(_hypNativeMinter);
}This preserves the deployment flexibility while maintaining the immutability security property once set. Code Quality & Best Practices✅ Good: Proper Safety Check AddedLocation: The addition of ✅ Good: Event EmissionLocation: Proper event emission for the minter update provides good transparency for off-chain monitoring. ✅ Good: Access ControlAll admin functions properly use the Deployment Script Review✅ Strong: CREATE2 ImplementationLocation:
✅ Good: Configuration FlexibilityThe script allows optional post-deployment configuration while clearly indicating that
|
Summary of ChangesHello @tac0turtle, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request modifies the FeeVault contract to allow the hypNativeMinter address to be set after deployment, instead of being an immutable constructor argument. This is a significant change that facilitates a more flexible deployment process. The changes include removing the immutable keyword, updating the constructor, adding a new setHypNativeMinter function, and adding a necessary check in sendToCelestia to ensure the minter is set. A new deployment script DeployFeeVault.s.sol is also added to handle the new deployment flow. The tests have been updated accordingly to cover the new logic and edge cases.
My main feedback is on the setHypNativeMinter function. While it correctly allows setting the minter address, it also allows the owner to change it at any time. This changes the trust model of the contract. I've suggested a change to allow the minter to be set only once, which would be more secure and likely aligns better with the intent of this PR.
| require(_hypNativeMinter != address(0), "FeeVault: zero address"); | ||
| hypNativeMinter = IHypNativeMinter(_hypNativeMinter); | ||
| emit HypNativeMinterUpdated(_hypNativeMinter); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The hypNativeMinter address can be updated multiple times by the owner. This was previously an immutable variable, which provided stronger security guarantees. If the intention is to only set this address once after deployment, consider adding a check to prevent it from being updated again. This would reduce the trust placed in the owner and prevent potential malicious updates in the future.
require(address(hypNativeMinter) == address(0), "FeeVault: minter already set");
require(_hypNativeMinter != address(0), "FeeVault: zero address");
hypNativeMinter = IHypNativeMinter(_hypNativeMinter);
emit HypNativeMinterUpdated(_hypNativeMinter);
Description
Type of Change
Related Issues
Fixes #(issue)
Checklist
Testing
Additional Notes