fix: getPeers size check #2417
fix: getPeers size check #2417
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Manav-Aggarwal has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 10 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Manav-Aggarwal, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a subtle bug in the getPeers function within pkg/sync/sync_service.go. The change refines the input validation for the seeds string, ensuring that an empty input correctly results in an empty list of peer IDs, preventing incorrect processing of an empty string by strings.Split.
Highlights
- Input Validation: Improved the handling of empty
seedsinput in thegetPeersfunction by adding an explicit check for an empty string (seeds == "") before attempting to split it. This ensures that an empty list of peer IDs is returned immediately when no seeds are provided.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
|
The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow CI and Release / buf-check (pull_request).
|
| if seeds == "" { | ||
| return peerIDs | ||
| } | ||
| sl := strings.Split(seeds, ",") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using strings.Split can result in empty strings in the slice if there are leading, trailing, or consecutive commas in the seeds string. This can lead to unnecessary error logging. Consider using strings.FieldsFunc to avoid empty strings in the slice.
sl := strings.FieldsFunc(seeds, func(r rune) bool { return r == ',' })
Manav-Aggarwal
force-pushed
the
pierrick/fix-peer-size-check
branch
from
1a96a91 to
eb66255
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2417 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 73.10% 72.92% -0.19%
==========================================
Files 67 67
Lines 6377 6378 +1
==========================================
- Hits 4662 4651 -11
- Misses 1318 1329 +11
- Partials 397 398 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
* main: feat: fix execution verification (#2433) build(deps): Bump github.com/spf13/viper from 1.19.0 to 1.20.1 (#2431) build(deps): Bump github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p-kad-dht from 0.29.1 to 0.33.1 (#2432) build(deps): Bump github.com/prometheus/client_golang from 1.21.1 to 1.22.0 (#2430) build(deps): Bump alpine from 3.18.3 to 3.22.0 (#2429) ci: fix dependabot patterns (#2427) feat: migrate logging to ipfs/go-log/v2 (#2416) fix: Consolidate some EVM E2E tests into one (#2423) feat: Support GetHeader in store (#2422) fix: Optimize E2E EVM tests (#2421) fix: getPeers size check (#2417) test: Add comprehensive EVM E2E tests (#2394) feat: migrate logging to ipfs/go-log/v2 (#2411) feat: execution verification (#2377)
Overview
Duplicate of #2408, was reverted in #2394