Skip to content

[New] Azure VM Extension Deployment by Interactive User#6176

Open
Samirbous wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
az-extension
Open

[New] Azure VM Extension Deployment by Interactive User#6176
Samirbous wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
az-extension

Conversation

@Samirbous
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Identifies the successful deployment of a high-risk Azure Virtual Machine extension by an interactive user principal. Attackers with privileged Azure RBAC roles can abuse VM extensions such as VMAccess, CustomScriptExtension, and RunCommand to execute arbitrary code, create backdoor accounts, harvest credentials, and establish persistence on Azure-hosted virtual machines without requiring direct network access to the VM.

image

Related https://github.com/elastic/ia-trade-team/issues/929

Identifies the successful deployment of a high-risk Azure Virtual Machine extension  by an interactive user principal. Attackers with privileged Azure RBAC roles can  abuse VM extensions such as VMAccess, CustomScriptExtension, and RunCommand to  execute arbitrary code, create backdoor accounts, harvest credentials, and establish  persistence on Azure-hosted virtual machines without requiring direct network access  to the VM.
@Samirbous Samirbous self-assigned this May 21, 2026
@Samirbous Samirbous added Integration: Azure azure related rules Rule: New Proposal for new rule labels May 21, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rule: New - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the rule.
  • List any new fields required in ECS/data sources.
  • Link related issues or PRs.
  • Include references.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • creation_date matches the date of creation PR initially merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive, considering performance for diverse environments. Non ecs fields should be added to non-ecs-schema.json if not available in an integration.
  • min_stack_comments and min_stack_version should be included if the rule is only compatible starting from a specific stack version.
  • index pattern should be neither too specific nor too vague, ensuring it accurately matches the relevant data stream (e.g., use logs-endpoint.process-* for process data).
  • integration should align with the index. If the integration is newly introduced, ensure the manifest, schemas, and new_rule.yaml template are updated.
  • setup should include the necessary steps to configure the integration.
  • note should include any additional information (e.g. Triage and analysis investigation guides, timeline templates).
  • tags should be relevant to the threat and align/added to the EXPECTED_RULE_TAGS in the definitions.py file.
  • threat, techniques, and subtechniques should map to ATT&CK always if possible.

New BBR Rules

  • building_block_type should be included if the rule is a building block and the rule should be located in the rules_building_block folder.
  • bypass_bbr_timing should be included if adding custom lookback timing to the rule.

Testing and Validation

  • Provide evidence of testing and detecting the expected threat.
  • Check for existence of coverage to prevent duplication.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant