Skip to content

[New] Azure Run Command Correlated with Process Execution#6169

Open
Samirbous wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
az-vm-exec
Open

[New] Azure Run Command Correlated with Process Execution#6169
Samirbous wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
az-vm-exec

Conversation

@Samirbous
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Samirbous Samirbous commented May 20, 2026

Correlates successful Azure Virtual Machine Run Command operations with endpoint PowerShell execution on the same host within two minutes. Adversaries abuse Run Command to run scripts remotely as SYSTEM while activity logs only record the control-plane action; Elastic Defend process telemetry reveals the on-guest payload.

image

Related issue https://github.com/elastic/ia-trade-team/issues/929

Correlates successful Azure Virtual Machine Run Command operations with endpoint PowerShell execution on the same host within two minutes. Adversaries abuse Run Command to run scripts remotely as SYSTEM while activity logs only record the control-plane action; Elastic Defend process telemetry reveals the on-guest payload.
@Samirbous Samirbous self-assigned this May 20, 2026
@Samirbous Samirbous added Integration: Azure azure related rules Rule: New Proposal for new rule Domain: Endpoint labels May 20, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rule: New - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the rule.
  • List any new fields required in ECS/data sources.
  • Link related issues or PRs.
  • Include references.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • creation_date matches the date of creation PR initially merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive, considering performance for diverse environments. Non ecs fields should be added to non-ecs-schema.json if not available in an integration.
  • min_stack_comments and min_stack_version should be included if the rule is only compatible starting from a specific stack version.
  • index pattern should be neither too specific nor too vague, ensuring it accurately matches the relevant data stream (e.g., use logs-endpoint.process-* for process data).
  • integration should align with the index. If the integration is newly introduced, ensure the manifest, schemas, and new_rule.yaml template are updated.
  • setup should include the necessary steps to configure the integration.
  • note should include any additional information (e.g. Triage and analysis investigation guides, timeline templates).
  • tags should be relevant to the threat and align/added to the EXPECTED_RULE_TAGS in the definitions.py file.
  • threat, techniques, and subtechniques should map to ATT&CK always if possible.

New BBR Rules

  • building_block_type should be included if the rule is a building block and the rule should be located in the rules_building_block folder.
  • bypass_bbr_timing should be included if adding custom lookback timing to the rule.

Testing and Validation

  • Provide evidence of testing and detecting the expected threat.
  • Check for existence of coverage to prevent duplication.

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link
Copy Markdown

tradebot-elastic commented May 20, 2026

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Azure Run Command Correlated with Process Execution (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@Samirbous Samirbous marked this pull request as draft May 20, 2026 17:58
@tradebot-elastic
Copy link
Copy Markdown

tradebot-elastic commented May 20, 2026

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Azure Run Command Correlated with Process Execution (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@Samirbous Samirbous added OS: Windows windows related rules OS: Linux labels May 20, 2026
@tradebot-elastic
Copy link
Copy Markdown

tradebot-elastic commented May 20, 2026

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Azure Run Command Correlated with Process Execution (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@Samirbous Samirbous marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2026 19:14
@tradebot-elastic
Copy link
Copy Markdown

tradebot-elastic commented May 21, 2026

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Azure Run Command Script Child Process (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ Azure Run Command Correlated with Process Execution (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link
Copy Markdown

tradebot-elastic commented May 22, 2026

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Azure Run Command Script Child Process (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ Azure Run Command Correlated with Process Execution (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants