Skip to content

Conversation

@johannes-esr
Copy link
Contributor

Integration of the content of the repository
https://github.com/eclipse-score/eclipse-score.github.io

The following files from eclipse-score.github.io (commit cab3d09cb3b7ccd04b8487a07fba4a0e72224607) were copied over (and slightly adjusted):

  • docs/index.rst
  • docs/get_involved.rst
  • docs/_assets/score_architecture_core_stack_target_picture.png
  • docs/_assets/score_architecture_high_level_overview.png
  • docs/_assets/score_roadmap.svg

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 10, 2025

License Check Results

🚀 The license check preparation job ran successfully.

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
2025/03/20 13:00:32 Downloading https://releases.bazel.build/7.4.0/release/bazel-7.4.0-linux-x86_64...
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server and connecting to it...
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: docs
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: docs
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: docs
Analyzing: target //docs:license.check.python (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //docs:license.check.python (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //docs:license.check.python (86 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //docs:license.check.python (96 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //docs:license.check.python (106 packages loaded, 209 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //docs:license.check.python (130 packages loaded, 818 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //docs:license.check.python (144 packages loaded, 2461 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //docs:license.check.python (144 packages loaded, 2465 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //docs:license.check.python (144 packages loaded, 2465 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //docs:license.check.python (148 packages loaded, 4611 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //docs:license.check.python (149 packages loaded, 4736 targets configured).
[8 / 13] Creating runfiles tree bazel-out/k8-opt-exec-ST-d57f47055a04/bin/tools/dash/formatters/dash_format_converter.runfiles [for tool]; 0s local
[11 / 13] JavaToolchainCompileBootClasspath external/rules_java~/toolchains/platformclasspath.jar; 0s processwrapper-sandbox
[12 / 13] Building docs/license.check.python.jar (); 0s multiplex-worker
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //docs:license.check.python up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/docs/license.check.python
  bazel-bin/docs/license.check.python.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 23.236s, Critical Path: 2.32s
INFO: 13 processes: 9 internal, 3 processwrapper-sandbox, 1 worker.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 13 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/docs/license.check.python docs/formatted.txt -review -project automotive.score -repo https://github.com/eclipse-score/score -token otyhZ4eaRYK1tKLNNF-Y
[main] INFO Querying Eclipse Foundation for license data for 69 items.
[main] INFO Found 45 items.
[main] INFO Querying ClearlyDefined for license data for 27 items.
[main] INFO Found 27 items.
[main] INFO License information could not be automatically verified for the following content:
[main] INFO 
[main] INFO pypi/pypi/-/debugpy/1.8.12
[main] INFO pypi/pypi/-/docutils/0.21.2
[main] INFO pypi/pypi/-/matplotlib/3.10.0
[main] INFO 
[main] INFO This content is either not correctly mapped by the system, or requires review.
[main] INFO A review is required for pypi/pypi/-/docutils/0.21.2.
[main] INFO A review request already exists https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/emo-team/iplab/-/issues/19880 .
[main] INFO A review is required for pypi/pypi/-/debugpy/1.8.12.
[main] INFO A review request already exists https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/emo-team/iplab/-/issues/19903 .
[main] INFO A review is required for pypi/pypi/-/matplotlib/3.10.0.
[main] INFO A review request already exists https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/emo-team/iplab/-/issues/19892 .

Integration of the content of the repository
https://github.com/eclipse-score/eclipse-score.github.io

The following files from eclipse-score.github.io (commit cab3d09cb3b7ccd04b8487a07fba4a0e72224607)
were copied over (and slightly adjusted):
- docs/index.rst
- docs/get_involved.rst
- docs/_assets/score_architecture_core_stack_target_picture.png
- docs/_assets/score_architecture_high_level_overview.png
- docs/_assets/score_roadmap.svg
@johannes-esr johannes-esr force-pushed the johannes-esr_introduction branch from 2a3744e to f928da3 Compare March 10, 2025 12:28
@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@pahmann
Copy link
Member

pahmann commented Mar 17, 2025

Quick draw could be to merge eclipse-score/eclipse-score.github.io#18 first.

@johannes-esr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pahmann, I'd suggest to merge this PR first (I'm currently waiting for feedback from @b-rei), and then remove the landing page and in parallel update this page. Would this be okay for you?

@pahmann
Copy link
Member

pahmann commented Mar 17, 2025

@pahmann, I'd suggest to merge this PR first (I'm currently waiting for feedback from @b-rei), and then remove the landing page and in parallel update this page. Would this be okay for you?

I don't mind. I just found it pretty awkward, when I was approached at Embedded World and people told me "Hey, the links do not work.

Feel free to accept my suggestions as commits. Or I can put patches on top of this PR, as you like.

@pahmann
Copy link
Member

pahmann commented Mar 20, 2025

All changes proposed in eclipse-score/eclipse-score.github.io#18 are implemented in this PR.

@pahmann pahmann marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2025 12:52
pahmann
pahmann previously approved these changes Mar 20, 2025
Copy link
Member

@pahmann pahmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-Review conducted. All findings implemented. One finding on overall documentation structure open. Agreed to discuss and implement via a separate issue.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <Philipp.Ahmann@de.bosch.com>
@pahmann pahmann force-pushed the johannes-esr_introduction branch from 7991040 to 786b5e9 Compare March 20, 2025 13:00
@pahmann
Copy link
Member

pahmann commented Mar 20, 2025

@b-rei I will merge the PR as discussed yesterday with you and @johannes-esr

@pahmann pahmann merged commit 77fe5f1 into main Mar 20, 2025
10 checks passed
@pahmann pahmann deleted the johannes-esr_introduction branch March 20, 2025 13:06
@pahmann
Copy link
Member

pahmann commented Mar 20, 2025

@eclipse-score/automotive-score-technical-leads kindly address the update of redirecting pages from 2 instances to 1.

FYI: @b-rei, @johannes-esr, @markert-r, @antonkri

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants