Skip to content

Conversation

@AlexSkrypnyk
Copy link
Member

@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk commented Feb 7, 2026

Summary

  • Display code coverage threshold in GitHub Actions job summary for better visibility when threshold check fails
image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced code coverage reporting visibility in pull requests by ensuring the computed coverage is recorded in the PR summary while preserving existing output and error handling. This change improves transparency of coverage results without altering behavior.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 7, 2026

Walkthrough

The workflow step "Check code coverage threshold" was modified to pipe the computed coverage line through tee, appending it to the GitHub step summary while preserving existing stdout output. No other logic or error handling changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub Actions Workflow
.github/workflows/build-test-deploy.yml
Coverage echo now pipes through tee so the computed coverage is both printed to stdout and appended to the GitHub step summary. No behavioral or error-handling changes.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(omitted)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • [#2183] Added posting of coverage to PR. #2184: Also touches the coverage threshold step in .github/workflows/build-test-deploy.yml; that PR implements coverage enforcement and PR-posting logic while this change adjusts output handling for the coverage line.

Poem

🐰 I nudged a pipe, made metrics sing,
Tee held the line, a tidy thing,
Coverage shown and summary kept,
One small hop — no secrets swept,
A rabbit's cheer for tests well prepped.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and accurately describes the main change: adding coverage threshold display to the CI job summary in GitHub Actions.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/fix-threshold-ci

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@AlexSkrypnyk
Copy link
Member Author

Code Coverage Report:
  2026-02-07 06:39:56

 Summary:
  Classes:  0.00% (0/1)
  Methods:  0.00% (0/2)
  Lines:   93.82% (167/178)

@AlexSkrypnyk
Copy link
Member Author

Code Coverage Report:
  2026-02-07 06:43:02

 Summary:
  Classes:  0.00% (0/1)
  Methods:  0.00% (0/2)
  Lines:   93.82% (167/178)

@AlexSkrypnyk
Copy link
Member Author

Code Coverage Report:
  2026-02-07 06:43:11

 Summary:
  Classes:  0.00% (0/1)
  Methods:  0.00% (0/2)
  Lines:   93.82% (167/178)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 7, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.22%. Comparing base (7cf277d) to head (265c12b).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2251      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.85%   76.22%   -0.63%     
==========================================
  Files         112      105       -7     
  Lines        5846     5687     -159     
  Branches       44        0      -44     
==========================================
- Hits         4493     4335     -158     
+ Misses       1353     1352       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk force-pushed the feature/fix-threshold-ci branch from 6733ab5 to 265c12b Compare February 7, 2026 07:09
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2026

Code Coverage Report:
  2026-02-07 07:15:33

 Summary:
  Classes:  0.00% (0/1)
  Methods:  0.00% (0/2)
  Lines:   93.82% (167/178)

@AlexSkrypnyk
Copy link
Member Author

Code Coverage Report:
  2026-02-07 07:15:44

 Summary:
  Classes:  0.00% (0/1)
  Methods:  0.00% (0/2)
  Lines:   93.82% (167/178)

@AlexSkrypnyk
Copy link
Member Author

Code Coverage Report:
  2026-02-07 07:18:25

 Summary:
  Classes:  0.00% (0/1)
  Methods:  0.00% (0/2)
  Lines:   93.82% (167/178)

@AlexSkrypnyk
Copy link
Member Author

Code Coverage Report:
  2026-02-07 07:19:09

 Summary:
  Classes:  0.00% (0/1)
  Methods:  0.00% (0/2)
  Lines:   93.82% (167/178)

@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk merged commit 47d41a0 into main Feb 7, 2026
31 of 37 checks passed
@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk deleted the feature/fix-threshold-ci branch February 7, 2026 23:50
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from BACKLOG to Release queue in Vortex Feb 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Release queue

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant