Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Paweł Gronowski <pawel.gronowski@docker.com>
thaJeztah
reviewed
Mar 17, 2026
Comment on lines
+34
to
+45
| # Fedora 41 and up has a fixed version of binutils, and no longer requires that | ||
| # patch, but may fail without ld.gold installed; | ||
| # | ||
| # /usr/bin/gcc -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,nocopyreloc -fuse-ld=gold -o $WORK/b001/exe/a.out -rdynamic /tmp/go-link-1738353519/go.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000000.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000001.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000002.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000003.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000004.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000005.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000006.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000007.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000008.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000009.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000010.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000011.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000012.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000013.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000014.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000015.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000016.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000017.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000018.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000019.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000020.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000021.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000022.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000023.o /tmp/go-link-1738353519/000024.o -O2 -g -lresolv -O2 -g -lpthread -O2 -g -ldl -O2 -g | ||
| # collect2: fatal error: cannot find 'ld' | ||
| # | ||
| # Fedora's build of Go carries a patch for that, but it's not (yet) in upstream; | ||
| # - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang/blob/a867bd88a656c1d6e91e7b18bab696dc3fcf1e77/f/0006-Default-to-ld.bfd-on-ARM64.patch | ||
| # - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang/c/a867bd88a656c1d6e91e7b18bab696dc3fcf1e77?branch=rawhide | ||
| # | ||
| # As a workaround; install binutils-gold | ||
| RUN if [ "$(rpm --query --queryformat='%{ARCH}' rpm)" = 'aarch64' ] && ! command -v ld.gold; then dnf -y install binutils-gold; fi |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
curious if we still need this hack 🤔
Contributor
|
Hi, docker is there now, but buildx isn't yet. Not sure if it's a known issue. I have raised #1306 to track the missing buildx for fedora 44. |
Member
|
Yes, it's a known issue; buildx didn't publish a release after Fedora 44 was added; our deploy pipeline initially failed because of that, but we ultimately chose to publish the packages we do have already (with |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We already have containerd packages for Fedora 44 (https://download.docker.com/linux/fedora/44/x86_64/stable/Packages/) so we can also start building the engine.