Remove dirfd definition for spawnProcessPosix#10976
Open
dd86k wants to merge 3 commits intodlang:masterfrom
Open
Remove dirfd definition for spawnProcessPosix#10976dd86k wants to merge 3 commits intodlang:masterfrom
dd86k wants to merge 3 commits intodlang:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thanks for your pull request and interest in making D better, @dd86k! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.
Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information. If you have addressed all reviews or aren't sure how to proceed, don't hesitate to ping us with a simple comment. Bugzilla referencesYour PR doesn't reference any Bugzilla issue. If your PR contains non-trivial changes, please reference a Bugzilla issue or create a manual changelog. Testing this PR locallyIf you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR: dub run digger -- build "master + phobos#10976" |
thewilsonator
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2026
ibuclaw
reviewed
Mar 17, 2026
rikkimax
requested changes
Mar 17, 2026
Author
|
This PR is now waiting on dlang/dmd#22750 (dirfd definition in core.sys.posix.dirent). |
Contributor
|
dependant PR merged |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
NetBSD sources define
dirfdas a macro, and not a function, in (NetBSD-src) include/dirent.h, as:This commit defines a macro (well, static function) akin to NetBSD's macro. Without it, there is a linker error for an undefined symbol for
dirfd.The cast is done as-is because the current ABI guarantees
dd_fdas the first field of_dirdesc(withtypedef struct _dirdesc DIR;), andDIRstructure in Druntime is only defined as an alias tovoid*.It's required to build DUB, because it spawns processes. I have compiled and used DUB on my end. It is in a working state and was able to compile my ddhx project.