Skip to content

Conversation

@rlskoeser
Copy link
Member

@rlskoeser rlskoeser commented May 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated coverage reporting configuration to set separate coverage targets for application and test code. Coverage checks now apply distinct thresholds for source and test files.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 23, 2025

Walkthrough

A new codecov.yml configuration file has been added to customize code coverage status checks. The configuration disables the default global check and introduces two specific contexts: one for application code in src/ with a 95% threshold, and another for test code in tests/ with a 100% threshold.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
codecov.yml Added configuration to define separate coverage status checks for application and test code.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant CI
    participant Codecov

    Developer->>CI: Pushes code
    CI->>Codecov: Uploads coverage reports
    Codecov->>CI: Evaluates coverage for "app" (src/) context (95%)
    Codecov->>CI: Evaluates coverage for "tests" (tests/) context (100%)
    CI->>Developer: Reports status for each context
Loading

Poem

Hopping through code with coverage in sight,
Now app and test each have their own light.
Ninety-five for app, a hundred for test—
With yaml in paw, we’re aiming our best!
Two little checks, one big leap,
Coverage dreams for rabbits to keep.
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec41ca3 and 916ab7f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • codecov.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • codecov.yml

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
codecov.yml (1)

5-8: Consider setting an explicit coverage threshold and glob pattern for “app”
Using target: auto relies on Codecov’s default (often 80% or the badge-configured value), which may drift over time. Specifying 95% makes your intent explicit. Likewise, updating the path to a glob (src/**) ensures all subdirectories are included.

Diff proposal:

 app:
-  target: auto  # default target (95%)
+  target: 95%  # enforce 95% coverage for application code
-    paths:
-      - "src/"  # limit to files within src code directory
+    paths:
+      - "src/**"  # include all files under src/
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2a7bcc1 and ec41ca3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • codecov.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
codecov.yml (2)

1-4: Disabling default coverage status check intentionally configured
The default: false setting at the project level correctly disables the global status check, allowing you to define fine-grained contexts below.


9-12: Verify the “test/” path and 100% threshold for tests context
Requiring 100% coverage on the test code itself is unusual since test files rarely invoke all their own lines (and may not be imported). Please confirm:

  1. Your test directory is actually named test/ (not tests/).
  2. That Codecov counts test-file coverage as expected.

If the directory is tests/, update the path accordingly.

@rlskoeser rlskoeser force-pushed the feature/codecov-config branch from ec41ca3 to 916ab7f Compare May 23, 2025 23:06
@rlskoeser rlskoeser merged commit 312dbf3 into develop May 27, 2025
9 checks passed
@rlskoeser rlskoeser deleted the feature/codecov-config branch May 27, 2025 13:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants