Feature/image vulnerablities fixes

[shree1988]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the security posture of the application by addressing identified image vulnerabilities. It achieves this by updating various Python dependencies and core packaging tools across two Docker images, cdc_data and cdc_services_runtime. The changes ensure that the build environments utilize more secure and up-to-date versions of critical libraries, contributing to a more robust and protected application deployment.

Highlights

• Dependency Upgrades in cdc_data Dockerfile: Upgraded several Python packages including setuptools, wheel, urllib3, pillow, and google-cloud-aiplatform within the cdc_data Docker image to address identified vulnerabilities.
• Core Python Tooling Updates in cdc_services_runtime Dockerfile: Updated core Python packaging tools such as pip, wheel, and setuptools in the cdc_services_runtime Docker image to enhance security and maintainability.

Changelog

• build/cdc_data/Dockerfile
  • Added a RUN pip3 install --upgrade command to update specific Python packages (setuptools, wheel, urllib3, pillow, google-cloud-aiplatform).
  • Included apt-get clean and rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/* for image size optimization after package upgrades.
• build/cdc_services_runtime/Dockerfile
  • Extended an existing RUN command to incorporate pip install --upgrade for core Python packaging tools (pip, wheel, setuptools).
  • Ensured apt-get clean and rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/* are executed after package installations.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix image vulnerabilities by upgrading several Python packages in the Dockerfiles. The changes are reasonable, but I have identified a few areas for improvement regarding Docker image optimization best practices and a potential dependency version inconsistency that should be addressed.

[dwnoble]

Rather than putting these version inline in the docker image, can they be moved to a requirements.txt file?

[shree1988]

Hi @dwnoble, I encountered a conflict error after adding it to the requirements.txt file; however, upgrading the package in the Dockerfile worked as expected.