Skip to content

Conversation

@rohitkumarbhagat
Copy link
Contributor

  • add run_from/run_until flags for running range of steps

Highlight key SDMX docs for faster navigation
Use extracted JSON for schema mapping and update tests
Document new pipeline step and outputs
Wire run_from/run_until into config and planning

Document and test range filtering
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @rohitkumarbhagat, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the SDMX import pipeline by introducing a dedicated step for metadata extraction and providing more flexible control over pipeline execution. The new metadata extraction step streamlines the processing of SDMX metadata by converting it to JSON, which improves efficiency for downstream operations like schema mapping. Additionally, the introduction of run_from and run_until flags allows users to precisely define which parts of the pipeline should run, facilitating debugging, testing, and partial re-runs without affecting other steps.

Highlights

  • SDMX Metadata Extraction Step: A new ExtractMetadataStep has been introduced into the SDMX import pipeline. This step is responsible for converting the raw SDMX metadata from XML format into a more easily consumable JSON format, which can then be utilized by subsequent pipeline steps.
  • Pipeline Step Range Execution: New command-line flags, --run_from and --run_until, have been added to the SDMX pipeline. These flags allow users to specify a precise range of steps to execute, providing greater control over pipeline runs for debugging, testing, or partial processing.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new metadata extraction step to the SDMX pipeline and adds run_from/run_until flags for more granular control over pipeline execution. The changes are well-implemented across the pipeline logic, tests, and documentation. I've identified a minor documentation issue and a regression in test coverage that should be addressed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant