Skip to content

Conversation

@zisoft
Copy link
Collaborator

@zisoft zisoft commented Dec 28, 2025

The function now checks against the exported file's modification time stamp instead of the export time stamp in the database. This makes a lot more sense especially when using the multi-preset export with different formats in multiple directories.

See #15404 (comment) and #19987 (comment)

The function now checks against the exported file's modification time
stamp instead of the export time stamp in the database. This makes a lot
more sense especially when using the multi-preset export with different
formats in multiple directories.
@zisoft zisoft force-pushed the fix-overwrite-if-changed branch from 44c4c99 to dc9429d Compare December 28, 2025 13:02
@DaveInDev
Copy link

hi @zisoft , thanks for your help : I will check tomorrow on the next nightly build.

@zisoft
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zisoft commented Dec 28, 2025

@DaveInDev: This is only included in the nightly build after the PR is merged.

@DaveInDev
Copy link

DaveInDev commented Dec 28, 2025

@zisoft I'm not familiar with github. Do you mean that it won't appear in tomorrow's build ? Is there another way to test this change ?

@TurboGit
Copy link
Member

Given the comment: #19987 (comment) I'll pass this as draft.

@TurboGit TurboGit marked this pull request as draft December 28, 2025 18:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants