This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 18, 2020. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
Make README more verbose #18
Open
RichardBarrell
wants to merge
1
commit into
darkskyapp:master
Choose a base branch
from
RichardBarrell:verbose-readme
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is an easier way to state the return values:
bs()will return that element's index.bs()will return-(x+1), wherexis where the element would have been if it was in the haystack. (Therefore if the element is less than all elements in the array, this would be-1; if the element is greater than all elements in the array, this would be-(haystack.length+1).)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point, that's terser. I think I want to break the latter half of that paragraph into bullet points.
This terser explanation omits explaining what happens if
minimumIndexandmaximumIndexare supplied… which makes it clearer.I think this would be better if I changed it so that the return value explains everything in the following order:
minimumIndexandmaximumIndex.I'll come back and have another go at writing later. Thank you for the feedback! :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is correct, though I found it a bit confusing. Since
xis negative, it's easier for me to understand it this way:If the needle is not equal to an element in the haystack,
bs()will return-x, wherex-1is the position where the element would have been if it were in the haystack.