Skip to content

DAOS-18710 test: Update provider tests to use dc_x for UCX.#17746

Open
jgmoore-or wants to merge 1 commit intodaily-testingfrom
jgm/DAOS-18710
Open

DAOS-18710 test: Update provider tests to use dc_x for UCX.#17746
jgmoore-or wants to merge 1 commit intodaily-testingfrom
jgm/DAOS-18710

Conversation

@jgmoore-or
Copy link
Contributor

Steps for the author:

  • Commit message follows the guidelines.
  • Appropriate Features or Test-tag pragmas were used.
  • Appropriate Functional Test Stages were run.
  • At least two positive code reviews including at least one code owner from each category referenced in the PR.
  • Testing is complete. If necessary, forced-landing label added and a reason added in a comment.

After all prior steps are complete:

  • Gatekeeper requested (daos-gatekeeper added as a reviewer).

Signed-off-by: Joseph Moore <joseph.moore@hpe.com>
@github-actions
Copy link

Ticket title is 'Change to using ucx+dc_x as the provider string for daily test run with UCX and for the weekly provider tests.'
Status is 'Open'
Labels: 'request_for_2.8'
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-18710

@daosbuild3
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional on Leap 15.6 completed with status FAILURE. https://jenkins-3.daos.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-17746/1/display/redirect

@jgmoore-or jgmoore-or requested a review from phender March 23, 2026 17:49
'--provider argument; i.e. "ucx+dc_x", "ofi+verbs", "ofi+tcp")')
string(name: 'TestProviderUCX',
defaultValue: 'ucx+ud_x',
defaultValue: 'ucx+dc_x',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: for master we'll also want to update https://github.com/daos-stack/daos/blob/provider-testing/Jenkinsfile#L100 in a separate PR.

@daosbuild3
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Medium UCX Provider completed with status FAILURE. https://jenkins-3.daos.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-17746/2/execution/node/322/log

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants