Skip to content

Update module github.com/opencontainers/selinux to v1.15.0#870

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/github.com-opencontainers-selinux-1.x
Open

Update module github.com/opencontainers/selinux to v1.15.0#870
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/github.com-opencontainers-selinux-1.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented May 22, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
github.com/opencontainers/selinux v1.14.1v1.15.0 age confidence

Release Notes

opencontainers/selinux (github.com/opencontainers/selinux)

v1.15.0

Compare Source

This release adds a new function, SetProcessKind, which is to be used instead of KVMProcessLabel[s] and InitProcessLabel[s] in case the user only wants to change the type of the existing label, not generate a new one. It also fixes an CI issue and optimizes label.InitLabels for a few common cases.

What's Changed

Full Changelog: opencontainers/selinux@v1.14.1...v1.15.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Signed-off-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added storage Related to "storage" package common Related to "common" package labels May 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

common Related to "common" package dependencies storage Related to "storage" package

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants