renovate: schema fix #282
Merged
renovate: schema fix #282
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We should have enough people here looking at the repo so I don't see a reason to explictly assign PRs ro someone. Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
See containers#280, the custom file regex manager now uses the managerFilePatterns key which accept an array. Note the .github/workflows/validate.yml doesn't actually exists right now but is again being renamed in containers#33 so let's just keep it at that. Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
Member
Author
|
@containers/container-libs-maintainers PTAL |
Member
|
LGTM |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #280, the custom file regex manager now uses the managerFilePatterns key which accept an array.
Note the .github/workflows/validate.yml doesn't actually exists right now but is again being renamed in #33 so let's just keep it at that.
Also drop the assignees comment