[AI-453] - I regenerated the SDK

[mar-js]

• I regenerated the SDK to version 7.0.5.
• Added /companies/current functionality.

[atlantis-conekta]

Plan Error

creating new workspace: mkdir /atlantis/repos/conekta/conekta-python/90/default: no space left on device

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @mar-js, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on updating the SDK to version 7.0.5 through an automated regeneration process. It introduces a new API endpoint to fetch information about the currently authenticated company and expands the range of supported payment methods. Additionally, it refines the handling and documentation of 3D Secure (3DS) modes within key data models, ensuring clearer behavior and better data integrity.

Highlights

• SDK Regeneration: The SDK has been regenerated, updating its version from 7.0.3 to 7.0.5 across all relevant configuration and source files.
• New Endpoint: Get Current Company: A new endpoint, /companies/current, has been introduced to the CompaniesApi. This allows for retrieving details of the currently authenticated company, complete with new methods and documentation.
• Payment Method Expansion: The CheckoutRequest model now supports pay_by_bank as an allowed payment method, expanding the available options for checkout processes.
• 3DS Mode Enhancements: The Checkout, OrderRequest, and CompanyResponse models have been updated with more precise descriptions for the three_ds_mode field, clarifying its conditional applicability. CompanyResponse also gains three_ds_enabled and three_ds_mode fields with validation.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request regenerates the SDK to version 7.0.5 and adds functionality for the /companies/current endpoint. The changes mostly consist of version bumps and auto-generated code for the new endpoint. My review focuses on the correctness of the new documentation, ensuring tests are in place for the new functionality, and improving the maintainability of the generated code. I've found a couple of issues in the documentation's example code and an empty test case for the new endpoint. I've also suggested a refactoring for the auto-generated code to reduce duplication, which should be possible given the use of custom templates.