Skip to content

Conversation

@haakonvt
Copy link
Contributor

This is part 14/16 of the full v8 PR

All comments that lead to changes will be pushed to the #2387 branch as fixups

haakonvt and others added 12 commits November 19, 2025 13:32
Without this, the dataclass refactor fails tests.
…stance_id

The retrieve_content and retrieve_content_buffer methods now accept
external_id and instance_id in addition to the existing internal id.

Examples:
  # By internal ID
  content = client.documents.retrieve_content(id=123)

  # By external ID
  content = client.documents.retrieve_content(external_id="my_doc")

  # By instance ID
  content = client.documents.retrieve_content(
      instance_id=NodeId(space="my_space", external_id="my_doc")
  )

Breaking change: retrieve_content_buffer now requires buffer as first parameter.
@haakonvt haakonvt requested review from a team as code owners November 19, 2025 14:08
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants