⚡️ Speed up function _get_centered_logo_positions by 16%
#2
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 16% (0.16x) speedup for
_get_centered_logo_positionsinpdd/logo_animation.py⏱️ Runtime :
266 microseconds→229 microseconds(best of575runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization achieves a 15% speedup by making two key changes:
Eliminated expensive
max()call: The original code usedmax(len(line) for line in logo_art_lines)which creates a generator and iterates through all lines to find the maximum width. The optimized version computes bothlogo_widthandlogo_heightin a single loop, avoiding the overhead of themax()function and generator expression.Replaced list append loop with list comprehension: The original code used a manual loop with
append()operations to build the target positions list. The optimized version uses a list comprehension[(p.orig_logo_x + offset_x, p.orig_logo_y + offset_y) for p in particles], which is faster for simple mapping operations in Python.The profiler data shows the original
max()call took 5.9% of execution time (132,492ns), while the new loop approach distributes this work more efficiently. The list comprehension also reduces the overhead from multipleappend()calls (59.1% of original runtime) to a single list creation operation (79.6% of optimized runtime, but with lower absolute time).These optimizations are particularly effective for large-scale scenarios - tests with 1000 particles show 16-26% improvements, while smaller cases see 3-11% gains. The optimization works best when there are many particles or logo lines with varying lengths, as it eliminates the quadratic behavior of repeatedly checking line lengths.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_tswszncf/tmpy8igrv1_/test_concolic_coverage.py::test__get_centered_logo_positionscodeflash_concolic_tswszncf/tmpy8igrv1_/test_concolic_coverage.py::test__get_centered_logo_positions_2To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-_get_centered_logo_positions-mgllsv3jand push.