Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link
Contributor

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Dec 28, 2025

📄 884% (8.84x) speedup for _gridmake2 in code_to_optimize/discrete_riccati.py

⏱️ Runtime : 1.07 milliseconds 109 microseconds (best of 85 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

Performance Optimization Summary

The optimized code achieves an 884% speedup (from 1.07ms to 109μs) by replacing NumPy's high-level array operations with Numba JIT-compiled explicit loops.

Key Optimizations

1. Numba JIT Compilation (@njit(cache=True))

  • Compiles the function to machine code at runtime, eliminating Python interpreter overhead
  • The cache=True flag stores the compiled version, avoiding recompilation costs on subsequent runs
  • Particularly effective here because the function contains simple arithmetic and array indexing operations that Numba optimizes well

2. Explicit Loop-Based Construction vs. NumPy Broadcasting

  • Original approach: Used np.tile(), np.repeat(), and np.column_stack() which create multiple intermediate arrays and perform memory allocations
  • Optimized approach: Pre-allocates the output array once with np.empty() and fills it directly using nested loops
  • This eliminates intermediate array creation and reduces memory allocation overhead

3. Why This Works

From the line profiler, the original code spent:

  • 76.4% of time in np.column_stack([np.tile(...)])
  • 8.5% in np.repeat()
  • 9.3% in np.tile() for the 2D case

These NumPy operations, while convenient, involve:

  • Multiple temporary array allocations
  • Memory copies during stacking operations
  • Python-level function call overhead

Numba's compiled loops avoid all of this by directly computing each output element in place.

Impact on Workloads

Based on function_references, _gridmake2 is called from gridmake() which:

  • Calls it once for 2 input arrays
  • Calls it iteratively for 3+ arrays (once initially, then in a loop for remaining arrays)

For multi-array scenarios (3+ inputs), the speedup compounds significantly since _gridmake2 is called multiple times per gridmake() invocation. The nearly 9x speedup per call translates to substantial gains in computational economics applications where Cartesian products are frequently computed for state space expansions.

Trade-offs

  • First call incurs JIT compilation overhead (~tens of milliseconds), but cache=True mitigates this for subsequent calls
  • Code is more verbose but dramatically faster for repeated execution patterns
  • Best suited for scenarios where the function is called multiple times (amortizing compilation cost)

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 31 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
⚙️ Click to see Existing Unit Tests
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2EdgeCases.test_both_empty_arrays 65.1μs 2.38μs 2640%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2EdgeCases.test_empty_arrays_raise_or_return_empty 65.5μs 3.83μs 1609%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2EdgeCases.test_float_dtype_preserved 65.5μs 2.21μs 2865%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2EdgeCases.test_integer_dtype_preserved 66.0μs 2.33μs 2731%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2NotImplemented.test_1d_first_2d_second_raises 49.2μs 27.8μs 76.7%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2NotImplemented.test_both_2d_raises 49.0μs 30.2μs 61.8%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_basic_two_element_arrays 69.3μs 7.88μs 780%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_different_length_arrays 66.5μs 2.54μs 2514%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_float_arrays 66.2μs 3.25μs 1936%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_larger_arrays 65.9μs 2.42μs 2627%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_negative_values 65.8μs 2.17μs 2937%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_result_shape 65.8μs 2.50μs 2530%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_single_element_arrays 39.3μs 2.46μs 1500%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_single_element_with_multi_element 66.2μs 2.25μs 2841%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With2DFirst.test_2d_first_1d_second 41.9μs 3.25μs 1188%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With2DFirst.test_2d_multiple_columns 12.7μs 2.17μs 486%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With2DFirst.test_2d_single_column 41.3μs 2.17μs 1805%✅
test_gridmake2_torch.py::TestGridmake2TorchCPU.test_2d_and_1d_matches_numpy 43.9μs 3.88μs 1033%✅
test_gridmake2_torch.py::TestGridmake2TorchCPU.test_both_1d_matches_numpy 68.5μs 3.33μs 1955%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-_gridmake2-mjq2prhv and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

## Performance Optimization Summary

The optimized code achieves an **884% speedup** (from 1.07ms to 109μs) by replacing NumPy's high-level array operations with **Numba JIT-compiled explicit loops**.

### Key Optimizations

**1. Numba JIT Compilation (`@njit(cache=True)`)**
- Compiles the function to machine code at runtime, eliminating Python interpreter overhead
- The `cache=True` flag stores the compiled version, avoiding recompilation costs on subsequent runs
- Particularly effective here because the function contains simple arithmetic and array indexing operations that Numba optimizes well

**2. Explicit Loop-Based Construction vs. NumPy Broadcasting**
- **Original approach**: Used `np.tile()`, `np.repeat()`, and `np.column_stack()` which create multiple intermediate arrays and perform memory allocations
- **Optimized approach**: Pre-allocates the output array once with `np.empty()` and fills it directly using nested loops
- This eliminates intermediate array creation and reduces memory allocation overhead

**3. Why This Works**

From the line profiler, the original code spent:
- **76.4%** of time in `np.column_stack([np.tile(...)])` 
- **8.5%** in `np.repeat()`
- **9.3%** in `np.tile()` for the 2D case

These NumPy operations, while convenient, involve:
- Multiple temporary array allocations
- Memory copies during stacking operations
- Python-level function call overhead

Numba's compiled loops avoid all of this by directly computing each output element in place.

### Impact on Workloads

Based on `function_references`, `_gridmake2` is called from `gridmake()` which:
- Calls it **once for 2 input arrays**
- Calls it **iteratively** for 3+ arrays (once initially, then in a loop for remaining arrays)

For multi-array scenarios (3+ inputs), the speedup compounds significantly since `_gridmake2` is called multiple times per `gridmake()` invocation. The nearly **9x speedup** per call translates to substantial gains in computational economics applications where Cartesian products are frequently computed for state space expansions.

### Trade-offs

- First call incurs JIT compilation overhead (~tens of milliseconds), but `cache=True` mitigates this for subsequent calls
- Code is more verbose but dramatically faster for repeated execution patterns
- Best suited for scenarios where the function is called multiple times (amortizing compilation cost)
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from aseembits93 December 28, 2025 18:39
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Dec 28, 2025
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot deleted the codeflash/optimize-_gridmake2-mjq2prhv branch December 28, 2025 18:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants