Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link
Contributor

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Dec 28, 2025

📄 1,039% (10.39x) speedup for _gridmake2 in code_to_optimize/discrete_riccati.py

⏱️ Runtime : 1.06 milliseconds 93.3 microseconds (best of 96 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimized code achieves a 10x speedup (1038%) by replacing NumPy's high-level array operations with JIT-compiled explicit loops via Numba's @njit decorator.

Key Optimizations

1. Numba JIT Compilation with @njit(cache=True)

  • Eliminates Python interpreter overhead by compiling to machine code
  • The cache=True flag stores compiled code between runs, avoiding recompilation cost
  • Particularly effective for loops, which NumPy operations like tile, repeat, and column_stack use internally but with Python overhead

2. Preallocated Output Arrays with Explicit Loops

  • Original approach: np.column_stack([np.tile(x1, x2.shape[0]), np.repeat(x2, x1.shape[0])]) creates three temporary arrays (tile result, repeat result, then column_stack result)
  • Optimized approach: Pre-allocates a single output array with exact size (x1.shape[0] * x2.shape[0], 2) and fills it directly via nested loops
  • Eliminates intermediate array allocations and memory copies

3. Direct Memory Access

  • Line profiler shows the original code spends 77.9% of time in np.column_stack and related operations
  • The optimized version replaces these with direct index assignments (out[idx, 0] = x1[i]), which Numba compiles to efficient memory writes

Performance Context

From function_references, _gridmake2 is called recursively within gridmake() when building cartesian products of multiple arrays. For d > 2 dimensions, the function is called d-1 times in a loop. This means:

  • Hot path impact: The 10x speedup compounds across multiple calls when expanding 3+ dimensional grids
  • Memory efficiency: For large input arrays, avoiding temporary allocations becomes increasingly important

Test Case Suitability

The optimization excels when:

  • Building cartesian products of moderately-sized vectors (e.g., 100-1000 elements each)
  • Called repeatedly in loops (as in the recursive gridmake case)
  • Input arrays have consistent dtypes (Numba's type specialization works best here)

The line profiler confirms the bottleneck was NumPy's high-level operations, which this optimization directly addresses through low-level compiled code.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 31 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
⚙️ Click to see Existing Unit Tests
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2EdgeCases.test_both_empty_arrays 64.3μs 2.12μs 2927%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2EdgeCases.test_empty_arrays_raise_or_return_empty 65.0μs 2.42μs 2588%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2EdgeCases.test_float_dtype_preserved 65.0μs 2.04μs 3083%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2EdgeCases.test_integer_dtype_preserved 65.4μs 1.96μs 3239%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2NotImplemented.test_1d_first_2d_second_raises 48.7μs 27.2μs 78.6%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2NotImplemented.test_both_2d_raises 48.9μs 28.0μs 74.4%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_basic_two_element_arrays 69.0μs 3.33μs 1971%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_different_length_arrays 66.1μs 2.25μs 2839%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_float_arrays 65.3μs 2.08μs 3036%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_larger_arrays 65.1μs 2.04μs 3087%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_negative_values 65.1μs 1.96μs 3226%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_result_shape 65.1μs 2.04μs 3089%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_single_element_arrays 38.6μs 2.12μs 1716%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With1DArrays.test_single_element_with_multi_element 65.7μs 1.88μs 3404%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With2DFirst.test_2d_first_1d_second 41.4μs 2.42μs 1614%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With2DFirst.test_2d_multiple_columns 12.5μs 2.00μs 527%✅
test_gridmake2.py::TestGridmake2With2DFirst.test_2d_single_column 41.0μs 2.04μs 1911%✅
test_gridmake2_torch.py::TestGridmake2TorchCPU.test_2d_and_1d_matches_numpy 43.1μs 2.71μs 1492%✅
test_gridmake2_torch.py::TestGridmake2TorchCPU.test_both_1d_matches_numpy 66.8μs 2.58μs 2486%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-_gridmake2-mjq1m0q5 and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimized code achieves a **10x speedup** (1038%) by replacing NumPy's high-level array operations with JIT-compiled explicit loops via Numba's `@njit` decorator.

## Key Optimizations

**1. Numba JIT Compilation with `@njit(cache=True)`**
- Eliminates Python interpreter overhead by compiling to machine code
- The `cache=True` flag stores compiled code between runs, avoiding recompilation cost
- Particularly effective for loops, which NumPy operations like `tile`, `repeat`, and `column_stack` use internally but with Python overhead

**2. Preallocated Output Arrays with Explicit Loops**
- **Original approach**: `np.column_stack([np.tile(x1, x2.shape[0]), np.repeat(x2, x1.shape[0])])` creates three temporary arrays (tile result, repeat result, then column_stack result)
- **Optimized approach**: Pre-allocates a single output array with exact size `(x1.shape[0] * x2.shape[0], 2)` and fills it directly via nested loops
- Eliminates intermediate array allocations and memory copies

**3. Direct Memory Access**
- Line profiler shows the original code spends 77.9% of time in `np.column_stack` and related operations
- The optimized version replaces these with direct index assignments (`out[idx, 0] = x1[i]`), which Numba compiles to efficient memory writes

## Performance Context

From `function_references`, `_gridmake2` is called recursively within `gridmake()` when building cartesian products of multiple arrays. For `d > 2` dimensions, the function is called `d-1` times in a loop. This means:
- **Hot path impact**: The 10x speedup compounds across multiple calls when expanding 3+ dimensional grids
- **Memory efficiency**: For large input arrays, avoiding temporary allocations becomes increasingly important

## Test Case Suitability

The optimization excels when:
- Building cartesian products of moderately-sized vectors (e.g., 100-1000 elements each)
- Called repeatedly in loops (as in the recursive `gridmake` case)
- Input arrays have consistent dtypes (Numba's type specialization works best here)

The line profiler confirms the bottleneck was NumPy's high-level operations, which this optimization directly addresses through low-level compiled code.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from aseembits93 December 28, 2025 18:08
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Dec 28, 2025
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot deleted the codeflash/optimize-_gridmake2-mjq1m0q5 branch December 28, 2025 18:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants