Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link
Contributor

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Jan 8, 2026

📄 57% (0.57x) speedup for retry_with_backoff in code_to_optimize/code_directories/async_e2e/main.py

⏱️ Runtime : 13.6 milliseconds 99.9 milliseconds (best of 250 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization delivers a 57% throughput improvement (from 89,199 to 140,250 operations/second) by replacing the blocking time.sleep() call with non-blocking await asyncio.sleep(). This is the critical change that makes this async function behave properly in concurrent workloads.

Key Changes

What changed: A single-line modification replaces time.sleep(0.0001 * attempt) with await asyncio.sleep(0.0001 * attempt) in the retry backoff logic.

Why this improves throughput: The blocking time.sleep() holds the entire event loop hostage during the backoff period, preventing ANY other async tasks from executing. With await asyncio.sleep(), the function yields control back to the event loop, allowing hundreds or thousands of concurrent retry operations to proceed in parallel while individual tasks wait for their backoff period.

Performance Characteristics

Trade-off: Individual function execution becomes slower (13.6ms → 99.9ms, an 86% regression in raw runtime). This is expected because asyncio.sleep() involves more overhead than the primitive time.sleep() - it must interact with the event loop, schedule wake-ups, and manage task state.

Why the optimization matters: In real-world async applications, you rarely call a retry function in isolation. The throughput metric reveals the true benefit: when running many concurrent operations (like retrying multiple API calls), the optimized version processes 57% more operations per second because tasks don't block each other during backoff periods.

Test Case Performance

The optimization particularly shines in scenarios with:

  • High concurrency workloads (test_retry_with_backoff_many_concurrent_*, test_retry_with_backoff_concurrent_execution) - multiple retry operations can progress simultaneously
  • Throughput-focused tests (test_retry_with_backoff_throughput_*) - where aggregate operations/second matters more than individual latency
  • Mixed success/failure patterns (test_retry_with_backoff_mixed_success_failure) - allows successful operations to complete while failed ones backoff

For single-invocation scenarios (test_retry_with_backoff_success_first_try), the individual latency trade-off is present but typically negligible compared to the actual work being retried (network calls, database operations, etc.).

Impact on Async Workloads

This optimization transforms retry_with_backoff from a function that accidentally blocks the entire async application during retries into one that properly participates in cooperative multitasking. In production systems handling multiple concurrent requests, API calls, or I/O operations, this 57% throughput gain directly translates to higher request rates, better resource utilization, and reduced overall system latency.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 561 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
import asyncio  # used to run async functions

# function to test
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from main import retry_with_backoff

# ============================
# Basic Test Cases
# ============================


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_success_first_try():
    """Test that the function returns the correct value when no exception occurs."""

    async def good_func():
        return "success"

    result = await retry_with_backoff(good_func)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_success_second_try():
    """Test that the function retries once and succeeds on the second attempt."""
    state = {"calls": 0}

    async def flaky_func():
        state["calls"] += 1
        if state["calls"] == 1:
            raise ValueError("fail first")
        return "ok"

    result = await retry_with_backoff(flaky_func, max_retries=2)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_success_third_try():
    """Test that the function retries twice and succeeds on the third attempt."""
    state = {"calls": 0}

    async def flaky_func():
        state["calls"] += 1
        if state["calls"] < 3:
            raise RuntimeError("fail")
        return "done"

    result = await retry_with_backoff(flaky_func, max_retries=3)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_raises_after_max_retries():
    """Test that the function raises the last exception after max_retries are exhausted."""
    state = {"calls": 0}

    async def always_fail():
        state["calls"] += 1
        raise KeyError("always fails")

    with pytest.raises(KeyError, match="always fails"):
        await retry_with_backoff(always_fail, max_retries=3)


# ============================
# Edge Test Cases
# ============================


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_invalid_max_retries():
    """Test that ValueError is raised if max_retries < 1."""

    async def dummy():
        return 42

    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="max_retries must be at least 1"):
        await retry_with_backoff(dummy, max_retries=0)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_func_returns_none():
    """Test that the function correctly returns None if the coroutine returns None."""

    async def return_none():
        return None

    result = await retry_with_backoff(return_none)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_func_raises_different_exceptions():
    """Test that the last exception is raised if different exceptions occur on each attempt."""
    state = {"calls": 0}

    async def multi_fail():
        state["calls"] += 1
        if state["calls"] == 1:
            raise ValueError("fail1")
        if state["calls"] == 2:
            raise RuntimeError("fail2")
        raise KeyError("fail3")

    with pytest.raises(KeyError, match="fail3"):
        await retry_with_backoff(multi_fail, max_retries=3)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_concurrent_execution():
    """Test concurrent execution of retry_with_backoff with different functions."""

    async def func1():
        return "one"

    async def func2():
        return "two"

    async def func3():
        raise RuntimeError("fail")

    results = await asyncio.gather(retry_with_backoff(func1), retry_with_backoff(func2), return_exceptions=True)

    # Test concurrent failures
    results_fail = await asyncio.gather(retry_with_backoff(func3, max_retries=2), return_exceptions=True)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_async_func_is_coroutine():
    """Test that retry_with_backoff works with an async function object."""

    async def coro_func():
        return "coroutine"

    result = await retry_with_backoff(coro_func)


# ============================
# Large Scale Test Cases
# ============================


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_many_concurrent_success():
    """Test large scale concurrent execution with successful coroutines."""

    async def make_func(i):
        async def f():
            return i

        return f

    coros = [retry_with_backoff(await make_func(i)) for i in range(100)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*coros)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_many_concurrent_failures():
    """Test large scale concurrent execution with all coroutines failing."""

    async def fail_func():
        raise Exception("fail")

    coros = [retry_with_backoff(fail_func, max_retries=2) for _ in range(50)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*coros, return_exceptions=True)
    for exc in results:
        pass


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_mixed_success_failure():
    """Test large scale concurrent execution with a mix of success and failures."""

    async def make_func(i):
        async def f():
            if i % 2 == 0:
                return i
            raise ValueError(f"fail{i}")

        return f

    coros = [retry_with_backoff(await make_func(i), max_retries=2) for i in range(50)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*coros, return_exceptions=True)
    for i, result in enumerate(results):
        if i % 2 == 0:
            pass
        else:
            pass


# ============================
# Throughput Test Cases
# ============================


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_throughput_small_load():
    """Throughput test: small load, all succeed."""

    async def make_func(i):
        async def f():
            return i * 2

        return f

    coros = [retry_with_backoff(await make_func(i)) for i in range(10)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*coros)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_throughput_medium_load():
    """Throughput test: medium load, half fail, half succeed."""

    async def make_func(i):
        async def f():
            if i % 2 == 0:
                return i
            raise RuntimeError(f"fail{i}")

        return f

    coros = [retry_with_backoff(await make_func(i), max_retries=2) for i in range(40)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*coros, return_exceptions=True)
    for i, result in enumerate(results):
        if i % 2 == 0:
            pass
        else:
            pass


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_throughput_high_volume():
    """Throughput test: high volume, all succeed, performance check."""

    async def make_func(i):
        async def f():
            return i + 1000

        return f

    coros = [retry_with_backoff(await make_func(i)) for i in range(200)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*coros)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retry_with_backoff_throughput_high_failure():
    """Throughput test: high volume, all fail, ensure all exceptions are raised."""

    async def fail_func():
        raise Exception("fail")

    coros = [retry_with_backoff(fail_func, max_retries=3) for _ in range(100)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*coros, return_exceptions=True)
    for exc in results:
        pass


# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-retry_with_backoff-mk53sv5d and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimization delivers a **57% throughput improvement** (from 89,199 to 140,250 operations/second) by replacing the blocking `time.sleep()` call with non-blocking `await asyncio.sleep()`. This is the critical change that makes this async function behave properly in concurrent workloads.

## Key Changes

**What changed:** A single-line modification replaces `time.sleep(0.0001 * attempt)` with `await asyncio.sleep(0.0001 * attempt)` in the retry backoff logic.

**Why this improves throughput:** The blocking `time.sleep()` holds the entire event loop hostage during the backoff period, preventing ANY other async tasks from executing. With `await asyncio.sleep()`, the function yields control back to the event loop, allowing hundreds or thousands of concurrent retry operations to proceed in parallel while individual tasks wait for their backoff period.

## Performance Characteristics

**Trade-off:** Individual function execution becomes slower (13.6ms → 99.9ms, an 86% regression in raw runtime). This is expected because `asyncio.sleep()` involves more overhead than the primitive `time.sleep()` - it must interact with the event loop, schedule wake-ups, and manage task state.

**Why the optimization matters:** In real-world async applications, you rarely call a retry function in isolation. The throughput metric reveals the true benefit: when running many concurrent operations (like retrying multiple API calls), the optimized version processes **57% more operations per second** because tasks don't block each other during backoff periods.

## Test Case Performance

The optimization particularly shines in scenarios with:
- **High concurrency workloads** (`test_retry_with_backoff_many_concurrent_*`, `test_retry_with_backoff_concurrent_execution`) - multiple retry operations can progress simultaneously
- **Throughput-focused tests** (`test_retry_with_backoff_throughput_*`) - where aggregate operations/second matters more than individual latency
- **Mixed success/failure patterns** (`test_retry_with_backoff_mixed_success_failure`) - allows successful operations to complete while failed ones backoff

For single-invocation scenarios (`test_retry_with_backoff_success_first_try`), the individual latency trade-off is present but typically negligible compared to the actual work being retried (network calls, database operations, etc.).

## Impact on Async Workloads

This optimization transforms `retry_with_backoff` from a function that accidentally blocks the entire async application during retries into one that properly participates in cooperative multitasking. In production systems handling multiple concurrent requests, API calls, or I/O operations, this 57% throughput gain directly translates to higher request rates, better resource utilization, and reduced overall system latency.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from KRRT7 January 8, 2026 07:06
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Jan 8, 2026
@KRRT7 KRRT7 closed this Jan 8, 2026
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot deleted the codeflash/optimize-retry_with_backoff-mk53sv5d branch January 8, 2026 07:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants