Add tests for multi-sig threshold validation#366
Merged
Conversation
|
@Jumongweb is attempting to deploy a commit to the vic's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
@Jumongweb Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits. You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #346
I added multisig threshold coverage in stellar.service.spec.ts (line 330): one test now rejects a threshold above the signer count, and another verifies the exact low/med/high threshold values are pushed into the Stellar setOptions call. The service guard itself is the one at stellar.service.ts (line 694).
I also cleaned up the existing Stellar service fixtures while I was in there so the spec uses real keypairs instead of placeholder G... strings, and I stubbed the XDR balance-ID decode in the unit tests to keep them deterministic. Verification passed with: