Skip to content

Conversation

@StephaneTrebel
Copy link
Collaborator

@StephaneTrebel StephaneTrebel commented Dec 4, 2025

Issues liées

Issues numéro: #1624

Cette application servira de réceptacle à la modularisation/refonte de server

@StephaneTrebel StephaneTrebel self-assigned this Dec 4, 2025
@StephaneTrebel StephaneTrebel marked this pull request as draft December 4, 2025 16:13
@github-actions github-actions bot added the built label Dec 4, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2025

🤖 Hey !

The security scan report for the current pull request is available here.

@StephaneTrebel StephaneTrebel force-pushed the add-nestjs-in-server branch 2 times, most recently from e9584d7 to 2f9f41d Compare December 18, 2025 16:44
@StephaneTrebel StephaneTrebel marked this pull request as ready for review December 22, 2025 08:41
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 22, 2025

🤖 Hey !

The @cpn-console/gitlab-plugin (v3.3.1) package already exists on npm but the source code has changed, you should consider updating the package version.

The version update warning should be ignored in the case of modifications that do not affect the code once it has been built, such as code formatting, etc...

The NestJS default one reveals A LOT of issues I don't have time to fix yet...
This is a remnant of the previous "framework". It will be implemented
through NestJS Controllers aftewards. It was kept as a way to check the
viability of the Modularization process.
@cloud-pi-native-sonarqube
Copy link

@StephaneTrebel StephaneTrebel changed the title Ajout de Nest.js côté Server Ajout d'une nouvelle application server-nestjs Jan 6, 2026
@StephaneTrebel StephaneTrebel merged commit 868f1bc into main Jan 6, 2026
33 checks passed
@StephaneTrebel StephaneTrebel deleted the add-nestjs-in-server branch January 6, 2026 13:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants