feat(deploy): show resource name and id in deploy output

[MichaelHogers]

Summary

• Adds a --verbose (-v) flag to deploy that includes the resource name and physical ID (UUID) for each created or updated resource
• --verbose implies --output, so no need to pass both

Default output

npx checkly deploy

Successfully deployed project "my-project" to account "My Account".

With --verbose

npx checkly deploy --verbose

Create:
    ApiCheck: homepage-check
      name: Homepage Check
      id: 7ea2b661-88fa-4658-9d5c-c8c8c10057a1

Update and Unchanged:
    BrowserCheck: login-flow
      name: Login Flow Check
      id: a3f1b2c4-55de-4a89-b012-1234abcd5678

Example usage

The ID lets you reference deployed resources programmatically. For example, a CI script that triggers a check run right after deploy:

DEPLOY_OUTPUT=$(npx checkly deploy --verbose 2>&1)
CHECK_ID=$(echo "$DEPLOY_OUTPUT" | grep -A2 "ApiCheck: homepage-check" | grep "id:" | awk '{print $2}')

# Trigger the check via API
curl -X POST "https://api.checklyhq.com/v1/checks/$CHECK_ID/trigger" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $CHECKLY_API_KEY"

Or an AI agent parsing deploy output to verify newly deployed checks are green.

Motivation

The deploy API response already contains physicalId (UUID) for each resource, but the CLI discarded it. Surfacing it behind --verbose makes deployed resources easier to identify and reference programmatically (e.g. by CI scripts or AI agents that need to act on specific checks after deploy).

Test plan

• Deploy with --verbose — verify name + id appear for created/updated resources
• Deploy without --verbose — output unchanged
• Deploy with --output only — name/id not shown (only diff summary)
• Preview mode (--preview) — verify name shown (no physicalId since it's a dry run)

[sorccu]

Since the new format is an extension of the current format, I feel like it would be appropriate to simply call it verbose mode and change the flag to -v | --verbose. Would that still achieve your goal?

[MichaelHogers]

@sorccu what about this latest version

[MichaelHogers]

@sorccu i've been thinking, can we always return the id, instead of only in verbose mode? i think it is always useful to know the id?

[sorccu]

Can you update the description to include an example of how the ID would be used?

Also, possibly premature if we change the PR again, but the description now refers to flags that no longer exist.