Skip to content

Conversation

@FaHaGit
Copy link
Contributor

@FaHaGit FaHaGit commented Sep 24, 2025

No description provided.

…tion

Signed-off-by: Fabian Hartung <fabian.hartung@chargebyte.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabian Hartung <fabian.hartung@chargebyte.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabian Hartung <fabian.hartung@chargebyte.com>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change here comes from the fact, that MCS doesn't need SLAC, correct?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@FaHaGit FaHaGit Sep 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO the picture was an old one from charge som or charge control c. Now it was generated with the delivered bsp-only file. But yes, in MCS there is no SLAC module and also the EvseV2G module was replaced with the iso15118_charger module (d20 only)

Signed-off-by: Fabian Hartung <fabian.hartung@chargebyte.com>
@FaHaGit FaHaGit merged commit d0b9dd8 into everest/charge_control_y Sep 29, 2025
1 check failed
@FaHaGit FaHaGit deleted the Everest/ccy_adaptations_for_2025.8.0 branch September 29, 2025 12:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants