Skip to content

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix path traversal in file download/read#74

Open
acebytes wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sentinel/fix-path-traversal-13364906497957853153
Open

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix path traversal in file download/read#74
acebytes wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sentinel/fix-path-traversal-13364906497957853153

Conversation

@acebytes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@acebytes acebytes commented Apr 2, 2026

🚨 Severity: HIGH
πŸ’‘ Vulnerability: Path traversal vulnerability in StatusSocket.swift's validate_config socket command. The expandingTildeInPath method does not resolve parent directory (..) components, potentially allowing malicious actors to bypass directory restrictions.
🎯 Impact: An attacker could provide a crafted path (e.g., ../../../etc/passwd) via the unix socket, leading to arbitrary file reads outside of the intended configuration directory.
πŸ”§ Fix: Mitigated the vulnerability by applying .standardizingPath after .expandingTildeInPath, and enforcing directory boundaries by verifying the final path .hasPrefix() strictly against the ~/.cacheout/ allowed directory path.
βœ… Verification: Run swift test to confirm regressions are avoided and tests pass (if environment permits). Read the associated code to confirm traversal vectors are closed.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 13364906497957853153 started by @acebytes

- Resolves an issue in StatusSocket.swift where `expandingTildeInPath` failed to prevent path traversal when validating configuration files.
- Refactored `handleValidateConfig` to use `.standardizingPath` and strictly ensure paths resolve inside the allowed `~/.cacheout/` boundary.
- Documented findings in .jules/sentinel.md.

Co-authored-by: acebytes <2820910+acebytes@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant