⚡ Bolt: [ProcessMemoryScanner concurrency optimization]#71
⚡ Bolt: [ProcessMemoryScanner concurrency optimization]#71
Conversation
- Replaced static chunking of PIDs with an iterator-based sliding window. - Eliminates tail latency where the task group had to wait for the slowest task in a chunk to complete before starting new tasks. - Maximizes throughput by keeping the active task count continuously at `maxConcurrency`. Co-authored-by: acebytes <2820910+acebytes@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
💡 What:
Replaced static chunking in
ProcessMemoryScanner.scanPIDswith an iterator-based sliding window approach. It usespids.makeIterator()to keep exactlymaxConcurrencytasks running at all times.🎯 Why:
The previous implementation grouped PIDs into static arrays (chunks) and awaited the entire group. If one
proc_pid_rusagecall was slow, the remaining available concurrency slots would sit idle until that slowest task finished, causing tail latency.📊 Impact:
Maximized concurrency throughput. When scanning hundreds of PIDs, this ensures the scanner finishes faster by eliminating idle wait times within chunks.
🔬 Measurement:
Review the refactored
scanPIDsmethod to verify it now enqueues a new task immediately as eachawait group.next()returns, rather than chunking.PR created automatically by Jules for task 17083400779117850752 started by @acebytes