Skip to content

SC-100: DNSSEC Clarification and Consolidation#667

Open
richardwsmith wants to merge 2 commits into
cabforum:mainfrom
richardwsmith:richardwsmith/SC100--DNSSEC-Clarification-and-Consolidation
Open

SC-100: DNSSEC Clarification and Consolidation#667
richardwsmith wants to merge 2 commits into
cabforum:mainfrom
richardwsmith:richardwsmith/SC100--DNSSEC-Clarification-and-Consolidation

Conversation

@richardwsmith
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Moves DNSSEC validation requirements from section 3.2.2.4 and 3.2.2.8 and consolidates them into a new section 3.2.2.10

… and consolidates them into a new section 3.2.2.10
@richardwsmith richardwsmith requested a review from a team as a code owner May 12, 2026 16:00
Comment thread docs/BR.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/BR.md

- Effective 2026-12-15, the CA MUST implement Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration using at least five (5) remote Network Perspectives. The CA MUST ensure that the requirements defined in Quorum Requirements Table are satisfied, and the remote Network Perspectives that corroborate the Primary Network Perspective fall within the service regions of at least two (2) distinct Regional Internet Registries. If the requirements are not satisfied, then the CA MUST NOT proceed with issuance of the Certificate.

#### 3.2.2.10 DNSSEC Validation Requirements
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Going to move all of this to 4.2.2.2 after SC-098 is out of IPR review. Additional changes will be needed in order to align with the new structure created by that ballot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant