Skip to content

Conversation

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

On OSS-Fuzz the fuzzers are built in one place and run in another, so include_bytes! is needed to get the wasm into the final binary. This is done with a layer of macros to avoid an include_bytes! for all wasm programs which would make the generated Rust metadata a bit... large.

On OSS-Fuzz the fuzzers are built in one place and run in another, so
`include_bytes!` is needed to get the wasm into the final binary. This
is done with a layer of macros to avoid an `include_bytes!` for all wasm
programs which would make the generated Rust metadata a bit... large.
@alexcrichton alexcrichton requested review from a team as code owners January 23, 2026 03:40
@alexcrichton alexcrichton requested review from fitzgen and removed request for a team January 23, 2026 03:40
@github-actions github-actions bot added the fuzzing Issues related to our fuzzing infrastructure label Jan 23, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

Subscribe to Label Action

cc @fitzgen

Details This issue or pull request has been labeled: "fuzzing"

Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:

  • fitzgen: fuzzing

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the .github/subscribe-to-label.json configuration file.

Learn more.

@fitzgen fitzgen added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 23, 2026
Merged via the queue into bytecodealliance:main with commit e472f50 Jan 23, 2026
45 checks passed
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the fix-component-async-oss-fuzz branch January 23, 2026 17:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fuzzing Issues related to our fuzzing infrastructure

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants