Skip to content

Conversation

@fitzgen
Copy link
Member

@fitzgen fitzgen commented Jan 21, 2026

Part of #12069

@fitzgen fitzgen requested review from a team as code owners January 21, 2026 19:52
@fitzgen fitzgen requested review from alexcrichton and removed request for a team January 21, 2026 19:52
@github-actions github-actions bot added cranelift Issues related to the Cranelift code generator fuzzing Issues related to our fuzzing infrastructure labels Jan 21, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

Subscribe to Label Action

cc @fitzgen

Details This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift", "fuzzing"

Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:

  • fitzgen: fuzzing

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the .github/subscribe-to-label.json configuration file.

Learn more.

And move allocation helpers from `wasmtime_environ::collections` to
`wasmtime_core::alloc`, with a re-export through the old location for
higher-level helpers.
@fitzgen fitzgen requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2026 19:46
@fitzgen fitzgen requested review from alexcrichton and pchickey and removed request for a team January 22, 2026 19:46
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Personally I'd say that wasmtime-{math,error} could get folded in here too (probably in a future PR), but wanted to confirm/deny your thoughts on that?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm half of the mind that there is no need to eagerly merge crates if we don't have any reason to do so, but I don't feel strongly at all. Anyways, I don't think there is anything blocking that, but I don't have any plans on doing it myself.

@fitzgen fitzgen enabled auto-merge January 22, 2026 23:11
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Oh also, along the lines of crate consolidation, can you add this crate to the Miri-tested crates in CI? I'll do a follow-up to merge our core utilities into this crate

@fitzgen fitzgen added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 22, 2026
Merged via the queue into bytecodealliance:main with commit 233f187 Jan 22, 2026
45 checks passed
@fitzgen fitzgen deleted the fallible-alloc-for-compound-bit-set branch January 22, 2026 23:47
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

can you add this crate to the Miri-tested crates in CI

I'm doing this in #12398

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cranelift Issues related to the Cranelift code generator fuzzing Issues related to our fuzzing infrastructure

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants