Add user search #47
Add user search #47
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @bniladridas, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the application's search capabilities by extending the existing task search to include user profiles. It involves comprehensive changes across both the frontend and backend to enable querying, retrieving, and displaying results for both tasks and users, thereby offering a more integrated and versatile search experience to the end-user. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Warning This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request successfully adds user search functionality alongside the existing task search. The changes on both the frontend and backend are logical and correct. I've provided a few suggestions to improve code maintainability by reducing duplication on the server-side, and to enhance the user experience on the frontend by handling cases where no search results are found.
| {tasks.map(task => ( | ||
| <li key={task.id}> | ||
| <p>{task.description}</p> | ||
| </li> | ||
| ))} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To improve the user experience, it's helpful to display a message when no tasks match the search query instead of showing an empty list.
| {tasks.map(task => ( | |
| <li key={task.id}> | |
| <p>{task.description}</p> | |
| </li> | |
| ))} | |
| {tasks.length > 0 ? ( | |
| tasks.map(task => ( | |
| <li key={task.id}> | |
| <p>{task.description}</p> | |
| </li> | |
| )) | |
| ) : ( | |
| <li>No tasks found</li> | |
| )} |
| {users.map(user => ( | ||
| <li key={user.id}> | ||
| <p>{user.name}</p> | ||
| </li> | ||
| ))} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to the tasks list, consider showing a message when no users are found to provide better feedback to the user.
{users.length > 0 ? (
users.map(user => (
<li key={user.id}>
<p>{user.name}</p>
</li>
))
) : (
<li>No users found</li>
)}| const filteredTasks = tasks.filter(task => | ||
| task.description.toLowerCase().includes(query) | ||
| ).sort((a, b) => a.description.localeCompare(b.description)); | ||
|
|
||
| // Sort the filtered tasks alphabetically by description | ||
| const sortedTasks = filteredTasks.sort((a, b) => a.description.localeCompare(b.description)); | ||
| // Filter users based on the query | ||
| const filteredUsers = users.filter(user => | ||
| user.name.toLowerCase().includes(query) | ||
| ).sort((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The filtering and sorting logic for tasks and users is very similar. To adhere to the Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle and improve maintainability, you could abstract this logic into a reusable helper function.
const filterAndSort = (items, key) =>
items
.filter(item => item[key].toLowerCase().includes(query))
.sort((a, b) => a[key].localeCompare(b[key]));
const filteredTasks = filterAndSort(tasks, 'description');
const filteredUsers = filterAndSort(users, 'name');
Summary[Write a one-sentence high-level summary of the change.]
Changes
👉 Use GitHub permalinks (commit-based links).
[Add any closing statement, e.g.:]
All tests pass locally and in CI, improving reliability and maintainability.