Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion requirements.lock
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ h11==0.16.0
httpcore==1.0.9
httptools==0.7.1
httpx==0.28.1
idna==3.11
idna==3.16
limits==5.8.0
pydantic==2.12.5
pydantic-settings==2.13.0
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions requirements.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,3 +6,5 @@ pydantic-settings>=2.14.0,<3
slowapi>=0.1.9,<1
limits[redis]>=5.8.0
python-dotenv>=1.2.2,<2
# Transitive (via httpx); pinned to clear CVE-2026-45409
idna>=3.15,<4
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Regenerate requirements.lock after pinning idna

The new idna>=3.15,<4 constraint in requirements.txt is not applied to the pinned lockfile, so CI’s dependency audit still reads idna==3.11 (.github/workflows/ci.yml runs pip-audit -r requirements.lock) and the Docker image still installs the vulnerable version from requirements.lock. In other words, this change doesn’t actually remediate the CVE in the audited/production dependency set until requirements.lock is regenerated and committed.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Loading