Skip to content

Conversation

@cheng191
Copy link

@cheng191 cheng191 commented Jan 4, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Added safeguards to avoid errors when path status information is missing, improving stability and preventing unexpected exceptions during fail/reinstate flows.
    • Tightened status validation so fail/reinstate actions only proceed when explicit status combinations are present, ensuring intended behavior when complete status data is available.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@mr-avocado
Copy link

mr-avocado bot commented Jan 4, 2026

You are changing one of the avocado utils which has already been migrated to AAutils project https://github.com/avocado-framework/aautils and this utility will be removed after the LTS release. Please make sure that all your proposed changes are already in AAutils and this PR is only backport.

For more information about AAutlis migration see https://avocado-framework.readthedocs.io/en/latest/blueprints/BP005.html

For a list of migrated utilities see https://avocado-framework.github.io/aautils.html

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 4, 2026

Walkthrough

Two inner functions in avocado/utils/multipath.py were changed to guard against a None return from get_path_status(path) before indexing. fail_path.is_failed now returns True only when path_stat is not None and path_stat[0] == "failed" and path_stat[2] == "faulty". reinstate_path.is_reinstated now returns True only when path_stat is not None and path_stat[0] == "active" and path_stat[2] == "ready". Both functions include an explicit final return False when checks do not pass. No public signatures were modified.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title mentions get_path_status returns None, but the changes focus on adding guards and return statements to fail_path and reinstate_path functions. Update the title to reflect the actual changes, such as: 'utils/multipath: add None guards to path status checks' or 'utils/multipath: ensure fail_path and reinstate_path handle None path_stat'.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 50.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35342d5 and 80f4786.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • avocado/utils/multipath.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • avocado/utils/multipath.py

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@mr-avocado mr-avocado bot moved this to Review Requested in Default project Jan 4, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @cheng191, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical runtime error where attempting to access elements of path_stat when get_path_status() returns None would lead to a TypeError. The changes enhance the robustness of path status checks by adding explicit None checks, ensuring that the application handles cases of non-existent paths without crashing.

Highlights

  • Error Handling: Introduced explicit None checks for the return value of get_path_status() in the is_failed() and is_reinstated() functions to prevent TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable.
  • Robustness: Ensured that if get_path_status() indicates a non-existent path by returning None, the functions gracefully return False instead of crashing.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a TypeError that occurs when get_path_status() returns None. The added checks prevent subscripting a NoneType object. I've suggested some minor refactoring in both modified functions to make the code more concise and Pythonic by combining conditional checks into a single boolean expression.

Comment on lines 275 to 280
path_stat = get_path_status(path)
if path_stat is None:
return False
if path_stat[0] == "failed" and path_stat[2] == "faulty":
return True
return False

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While the fix is correct, this function can be made more concise. The series of if statements and returns can be combined into a single boolean expression.

        path_stat = get_path_status(path)
        return path_stat is not None and path_stat[0] == "failed" and path_stat[2] == "faulty"

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Has been modified.

Comment on lines 297 to 302
path_stat = get_path_status(path)
if path_stat is None:
return False
if path_stat[0] == "active" and path_stat[2] == "ready":
return True
return False

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Similar to the is_failed function, this can also be simplified into a single boolean expression for better readability and conciseness.

        path_stat = get_path_status(path)
        return path_stat is not None and path_stat[0] == "active" and path_stat[2] == "ready"

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Has been modified.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 73.59%. Comparing base (111ca38) to head (35342d5).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
avocado/utils/multipath.py 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6260   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.58%   73.59%           
=======================================
  Files         206      206           
  Lines       22497    22493    -4     
=======================================
- Hits        16555    16554    -1     
+ Misses       5942     5939    -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@richtja richtja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @cheng191, thank you for your contribution. The changes LGTM. Please just update your commit message to be aligned with our Commit style guide and run black . in the avocado root directory to fix the style issues. Thank you.

@cheng191 cheng191 changed the title fix When get_path_status() returns None (indicating that the path does not exist), directly accessing path_stat[0] and path_stat[2] will raise a TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable. Fix : where get_path_status returns None. Jan 6, 2026
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Fix all issues with AI Agents 🤖
In @avocado/utils/multipath.py:
- Around line 276-280: The is_failed() helper is checking for the wrong state;
change its logic to detect a failed path by verifying path_stat is not None and
that path_stat[0] == "failed" and path_stat[2] == "faulty" (instead of
"active"/"ready"). Update the is_failed function to return True when those
failed/faulty values are present so fail_path() will correctly recognize a
successfully failed path. Ensure the function still guards against path_stat
being None before accessing indices.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 090ffe3 and 4be0660.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • avocado/utils/multipath.py
🔇 Additional comments (1)
avocado/utils/multipath.py (1)

298-302: LGTM: Correct logic with proper None guard.

The None check correctly prevents an IndexError when get_path_status() returns None, and the logic properly verifies that the path has been reinstated to an active and ready state.

@cheng191 cheng191 force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 86831ea to 35342d5 Compare January 6, 2026 03:33
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI Agents
In @avocado/utils/multipath.py:
- Around line 274-280: The is_failed() helper currently checks the checker
status against "ready" which is inverted; update is_failed() to verify that
get_path_status(path) returns a checker status of "faulty" (i.e. change the
comparison in is_failed() from path_stat[2] == "ready" to path_stat[2] ==
"faulty") so fail_path() correctly detects a failed path; ensure the logic still
guards for path_stat is not None and still compares the primary status
(path_stat[0]) as "failed".
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4be0660 and 86831ea.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • avocado/utils/multipath.py
🔇 Additional comments (1)
avocado/utils/multipath.py (1)

296-302: LGTM: None check prevents IndexError.

The None guard successfully addresses the PR objective by preventing IndexError when get_path_status() returns None. The status checks ("active" dm_st and "ready" chk_st) correctly verify a reinstated path.

@cheng191 cheng191 changed the title Fix : where get_path_status returns None. utils/multipath: get_path_status returns None. Jan 6, 2026
Signed-off-by: 成渭滨 <chengweibin@uniontech.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Review Requested

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants