Updated regex for slot_ibm to include optional -R\d+ segment.

[maramsmurthy]

This allows matching both standard and extended slot formats: Standard: U50EE.001.WZS00TL-P3-C14
Extended: U50EE.001.WZS00TL-P3-C14-R1
Change ensures compatibility with newer hardware naming conventions that include resource identifiers after the slot number. Backward Compatibility:

Existing slot formats without -R remain fully supported. No impact on current parsing logic for standard slot names. Testing Impact:

Verified regex against both formats to ensure correct matching. Additional unit tests recommended for extended slot names to prevent regressions.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved PCI slot detection to support additional IBM hardware device code format variations with optional suffixes, enhancing compatibility with a broader range of systems.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A regex pattern in the get_slot_from_sysfs function of avocado/utils/pci.py was modified to extend IBM loc-code slot pattern matching. The pattern was updated to optionally accept a trailing "-R" suffix by adding a non-capturing optional group (?:-R\d+)? to the existing pattern. The modification preserves all existing matches while enabling matching of IBM loc-code strings with the additional suffix. The remainder of the control flow logic remains unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5-10 minutes

• Verify the regex pattern correctly matches both with and without the "-R" suffix
• Confirm backward compatibility with existing IBM loc-code strings that lack the suffix
• Review the optional group syntax (?:-R\d+)? to ensure it captures the intended pattern

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: a regex update to accept an optional -R\d+ segment in the IBM slot pattern.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 74b7379 and 9cc6d14.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• avocado/utils/pci.py (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (43)

• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-ppc64le
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-s390x
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-ppc64le
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-s390x
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
• GitHub Check: Linux with Python 3.13
• GitHub Check: Linux with Python 3.9
• GitHub Check: Linux with Python 3.11
• GitHub Check: Linux with Python 3.10
• GitHub Check: Linux with Python 3.12
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-s390x
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
• GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-ppc64le
• GitHub Check: Build Package (wheel/tarball) for Python 3.10
• GitHub Check: Fedora selftests
• GitHub Check: Version task ubi:8.8
• GitHub Check: macOS with Python 3.11
• GitHub Check: Windows with Python 3.13
• GitHub Check: Version task debian:12.4
• GitHub Check: Windows with Python 3.11
• GitHub Check: Windows with Python 3.10
• GitHub Check: Version task ubuntu:22.04
• GitHub Check: Static checks
• GitHub Check: Code Coverage (3.11)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

avocado/utils/pci.py (1)

203-205: Regex extension looks correct and backward‑compatible

The added optional non‑capturing group (?:-R\d+)? cleanly extends the IBM loc‑code pattern to cover the -R<digits> suffix while preserving all existing matches and group numbering (since it’s non‑capturing). Given the complexity of this regex and its importance, please ensure we also add/extend unit tests to cover examples like U50EE.001.WZS00TL-P3-C14-R1 (and still cover the legacy ...-P3-C14 case) so regressions are caught going forward.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 73.49%. Comparing base (74b7379) to head (9cc6d14).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6246   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.48%   73.49%           
=======================================
  Files         206      206           
  Lines       22494    22494           
=======================================
+ Hits        16530    16531    +1     
+ Misses       5964     5963    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[PraveenPenguin]

LGTM

[clebergnu]

@maramsmurthy thanks for this contribution. Could you please:

1. Put an (external) reference to the format of the extended version of the identifiers
2. Add a test that matches both old and new (extended) versions

Thanks!