Conversation
|
Very good. The note
could potentially be made even more general. In my experience the generated code itself can also be "too verbose", e.g. repeated/redundant code, dead variables/code and this verbosity increases the burden of the reviewers/maintainers. Just a comment, it's good as it is. |
Good thought - I've tweaked it some. |
|
Boundaries = freedom. |
This AI policy serves as a beginning and may evolve over time. It is a modified version of what was proposed on the Apache Arrow project and discussed on their own mailing list: apache/arrow#48952 This fundamentally does not forbid the use of LLMs but does require many things of the individual using them in order to be accepted, and explicitly states that we may outright close such PRs.
This AI policy serves as a beginning and may evolve over time. It is a modified version of what was proposed on the Apache Arrow project and discussed on their own mailing list:
apache/arrow#48952
This fundamentally does not forbid the use of LLMs but does require many things of the individual using them in order to be accepted, and explicitly states that we may outright close such PRs.