[MINOR][DOCS] Fix several nit issues in documentation #54266
Closed
+5
−5
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
@dongjoon-hyun Could you please review? Thanks! |
Member
|
@anshulbaliga7, please check the CI results and follow the guidance to enable GitHub Actions on your forked repo. |
Contributor
Author
|
@pan3793, Thanks! I’ve re-triggered the CI, and all checks are now passing. Could you please take another look? |
pan3793
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2026
Member
|
thanks, merged to master (4.2.0) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds minor nit fixes in documentation.
Why are the changes needed?
Helps improve documentation clarity and correctness.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Only Doc changes
How was this patch tested?
CI
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No