Add blog post on writing agent skills for datafusion-python#187
Open
timsaucer wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Add blog post on writing agent skills for datafusion-python#187timsaucer wants to merge 4 commits into
timsaucer wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
Walks through the user-facing vs developer skill split, the TPC-H grounding exercise, and the iterative feedback loop we used to keep the skills honest as the API moved. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
ntjohnson1
approved these changes
May 23, 2026
ntjohnson1
left a comment
ntjohnson1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All nits so accept or reject however makes sense to you. This looks great. Excited for when this publishes
Member
|
The staged URL is not working for me |
Contributor
|
perhaps the staging was overwritten by the ballista 53 blog, https://datafusion.staged.apache.org/blog/ |
Address ntjohnson1's review on the writing-agent-skills post: trim filler wording, fix mixed tenses, disambiguate "wrapped library", and link the first mention of "skill" to agentskills.io. Also add a new paragraph explaining how end users selectively install one of several skills via `npx skills add --skill <name>`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per ntjohnson1's review: explain that loading the user skill while authoring maintainer code surfaces hallucinated APIs as ergonomic signal (e.g. `exists_ok` shaped by other Python libs), and that the same skill keeps maintainer-written docstrings, examples, and tests idiomatic on the first pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per ntjohnson1's review: pass 3 should also surface inconsistencies in the repo itself. When the agent emits a non-idiomatic pattern, ask where it came from — if the answer is an examples/ script, a stale docstring, or a README snippet, fix that source as well as the skill, since the skill alone cannot stop future agents or human contributors from rediscovering the drift. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Member
Author
|
Thank you for the comments @ntjohnson1 ! @andygrove the site should work, at least until someone pushes another branch that overwrites it. The latest |
Member
Oh, I didn't know that it only showed the latest pending branch |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Staged site: https://datafusion.staged.apache.org/blog/2026/05/22/writing-agent-skills/