Change to display if public IPs are reserved in the tab

[Tonitzpp]

Description

Currently, it is possible to check whether a range of public IPs is reserved for system VMs or not; however, this information can be hard to find since it’s located in a sub-menu with a name that doesn’t relate to the topic. Thus, this PR moves this information directly to the ranges listing in the Public tab under the Traffic types of a physical network.

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Screenshots (if appropriate):

IP range before the changes:

IP range after the changes:

How Has This Been Tested?

I added two new IP ranges to a Public traffic type in a physical network, one being dedicated to system VMs, while the other was not. When the traffic type details was accessed, it was possible to validate that the dedicated range appeared as true in the Reserved system IP column, while the other one appeared as false.

[DaanHoogland]

@blueorangutan ui

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 17.85%. Comparing base (46cb805) to head (a34801d).
⚠️ Report is 135 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #12461      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     17.60%   17.85%   +0.24%     
- Complexity    15668    15982     +314     
============================================
  Files          5915     5929      +14     
  Lines        529967   531045    +1078     
  Branches      64734    64913     +179     
============================================
+ Hits          93304    94794    +1490     
+ Misses       426195   425636     -559     
- Partials      10468    10615     +147     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.58% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	18.94% <ø> (+0.26%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[blueorangutan]

UI build: ✔️
Live QA URL: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/simulator/pr/12461 (QA-JID-849)

[Damans227]

Tested the fix at https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/client/pr/12461/#/dashboard

Navigated to Infrastructure > Zones > Physical Network > Public traffic type and examined the IP Ranges table.

The new "Reserved system IP" column is now visible in the table and correctly displays "false" for non-reserved IP ranges (verified with range 192.168.1.10 - 192.168.1.199).

[Damans227]

Looks straightforward and clean. LGTM.

[DaanHoogland]

clgtm