[#10029][benchmarks] arrow-flight roundtrip as well as encode/decode #10031
Open
Rich-T-kid wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
[#10029][benchmarks] arrow-flight roundtrip as well as encode/decode #10031Rich-T-kid wants to merge 1 commit into
Rich-T-kid wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
20b0d75 to
4f6d153
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@asubiotto / @rumenov Would you mind taking a look at this? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Rationale for this change
Provides benchmarks for arrow-flight crate. benchmarks for round trip as well as encode/decode individually.
What changes are included in this PR?
Adds three criterion benches under arrow-flight/benchmarks/ (roundtrip.rs, flight_encode.rs, flight_decode.rs), each sweeping a tunable matrix of ROWS, COLS, and column TYPES (fixed Int64, variable StringArray, nested List, dict DictionaryArray) built via a shared
common::build_batch helper.
Are these changes tested?
n/a
Are there any user-facing changes?
no