Update copy in ReadMe and Resource#138
Conversation
Update Nano Banana sample info in main readme
Summary of ChangesHello @lethargicpanda, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on enhancing the clarity and accuracy of documentation and user-facing text by updating specific terminology. It ensures that model names, API references, and common phrases are consistent with current branding and grammatical standards, improving the overall user experience and readability of the project's resources. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates copy across several README files and string resources. The changes align with the goals stated in the description, such as updating model names, standardizing 'Gemini Live' to 'Gemini Live API', and using 'to-do' instead of 'Todo'. The updates are mostly consistent, but I've pointed out a couple of minor issues. One is a deviation from the naming convention in the main README.md, and the other is the removal of a potentially useful guidance string in one of the samples. Overall, good job on keeping the documentation and resources up to date.
JolandaVerhoef
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
two small remarks, lgtm otherwise.
Update copy in ReadMe and Resource: