-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
feat(evaluation): multi-value array property support for non-set operators #65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kyeh-amp
wants to merge
6
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
evaluation-array-values-fix
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
265f169
test: add harness for operator + property-value combinations
kyeh-amp d55f18c
test: add failing cases for array-valued non-set operator matching
kyeh-amp 4250465
feat(evaluation): any-match semantics for array-valued non-set operators
kyeh-amp 52c3fdf
test: switch integration deployment key to VVhLULX superset
kyeh-amp 3e560c9
test: integration coverage for array-valued property operators
kyeh-amp 2045fa9
refactor(evaluation): preserve falsy-string elements in coerceStringA…
kyeh-amp File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Negation operators wrongly use any-match for arrays
High Severity
matchStringsNonSetapplies "return true if ANY element satisfies" logic uniformly to all operators, including negation ones (is not,does not contain,regex does not match). This causes bothis Xandis not Xto returntruefor the same array value (e.g.,['a', 'b']with filter['a']), breaking complementarity. For targeting,is not Xon an array almost certainly means "X is not among the values" (all-must-satisfy / none-matches-positive), not "some element differs from X" which is trivially true for any multi-element array. The integration tests use non-overlapping values that pass under both interpretations, masking this issue.Additional Locations (1)
src/EvaluationCore/EvaluationEngine.php#L133-L136Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 2045fa9. Configure here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this valid?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a valid assertion of the logic, but the relevance is off. In the end the implementation mirrors the observed filtering logic in charts/analytics.