docs(todo): PR #86 post-merge-feedback の Tier 1/3 finding を採用#87
Merged
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughドキュメント Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/todo2.md`:
- Around line 652-688: The design is invalid because PreToolUse
([pre_tool_validate]) cannot access prior tool-call context; update the proposal
to either (1) adopt the recommended PostToolUse approach by changing the
implementation plan to "PostToolUse + history buffering" and specify adding a
lightweight state file under .claude/ that records the last N tool calls
(including run_in_background flags) so the PostToolUse linter can detect a
subsequent until.*sleep polling pattern, or (2) propose adding a new hook type
that exposes session tool-call history; also revise the completion criteria to
"implementation approach decided and documented (PostToolUse + state buffering)
or new-hook spec completed" rather than immediate detection readiness.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 2e81bb37-ec71-4665-9c50-8197010dbcb2
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/todo.mddocs/todo2.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
PR #86 マージ後の post-merge-feedback (ADR-030) が抽出した Tier 1 + Tier 3 の計 3 件 を採用し、
docs/todo.md/docs/todo2.mdに反映する。反映内容
新規エントリ (docs/todo2.md、3 件)
docs/todo.md 更新
Tier 1 (1〜6) → Tier 2 (7〜10) → Tier 3 (11〜18) → Tier 4-5 (19〜20)に更新/20) に更新動機
post-merge-feedback (ADR-030) フィードバックループの 3 周回目。本セッションで顕在化した polling anti-pattern による rate limit 大量消費 (40% / 1 時間) への決定論的防止策を最優先で起案。
特筆すべき finding:
Test plan
順位 N/10,順位 N/13,順位 N/17) の dangling 参照ゼロを grep で確認済 (push 前検証)Summary by CodeRabbit
リリースノート