Skip to content

Conversation

@jeronimoalbi
Copy link
Member

Dither protocol is open, it uses a memo field and a send message, so anyone can "pollute" Dither namespace sending multiple transactions using different non existent function names, which might be expected to be supported in the future. Apart from polluting the namespace they could also generate issues when replaying historical transactions to restore the data.

Versioning dither protocol implementation makes the protocol safer.

Versions are defined by the address of the destination account used in the send messages.
New versions must be created when the protocol changes because new functions are added, or because existing function parameters change. A new version means that the destination account for the send transactions must be changed to a different one.

@jeronimoalbi jeronimoalbi self-assigned this Nov 28, 2025
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 28, 2025

Deploy Preview for dither-staging ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0e8c672
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/dither-staging/deploys/692adfbcf8d57a00088bd125
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-494--dither-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@jeronimoalbi jeronimoalbi changed the title feat: add support for versioning Dither protocol feat: add support for versioning Dither protocol implementations Nov 28, 2025
@jeronimoalbi jeronimoalbi changed the title feat: add support for versioning Dither protocol implementations feat: support for versioning Dither protocol implementations Nov 28, 2025
@jeronimoalbi jeronimoalbi marked this pull request as ready for review November 28, 2025 19:16
@jeronimoalbi
Copy link
Member Author

cc @Kouteki

@Kouteki Kouteki requested a review from zivkovicmilos December 7, 2025 10:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants