Merged
Conversation
d6ff44c to
dfde57a
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
This PR requires more effort to action, as |
dfde57a to
ef30dd4
Compare
ef30dd4 to
cc0f73e
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Now that we're building on ubuntu 22 agents, this PR can be re-opened without any changes to the build configuration. |
lempira
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves the audit issues against the
cryptographypackage.The Auth0 package has relaxed their version constraints in auth0/auth0-python#660, which indicates that the latest version is compatible with the latest
cryptographyandpyjwtpackages. I diffed the latest version of the Auth0token_verifier.pyagainst the copy we have vendored and nothing meaningful has changed.Additionally I have tested the dispenser features to confirm everything functions correctly.