chore: release package#1796
Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
437b002 to
e39d569
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.
Releases
@adcp/sdk@7.5.1
Patch Changes
099e077: docs: align bridge framing with revised single-dimension certification model
Maintainer walked back the two-badge "proxy-seller vs state-local-seller" split from Bridge leaderboard policy: how does a runner-visible bridge marker get consumed? #1782 and proposed a single-dimension "Wire Conformance / Live Integration Verified" framing instead — every seller faces the same verifiability gap; the bridge is one of two mechanisms for closing the seed→read loop, not a special path for one seller class. This change folds the revised framing back into the JSDoc on
AdcpServerConfig.testControllerand intoskills/build-seller-agent/SKILL.md.JSDoc (
src/lib/server/create-adcp-server.ts):Seller-agent skill (
skills/build-seller-agent/SKILL.md):TestControllerBridge), explains the decision rule, and hedges on certification names while the badge model in Bridge leaderboard policy: how does a runner-visible bridge marker get consumed? #1782 settles._bridgemarker's narrowed role: it tracks fixture-vs-upstream provenance per step, feeding live-integration eligibility, but is not itself a seller-class marker.No SDK behavior change. The marker contract from feat(testing): bridge participation marker (#1775) #1786, the JSDoc trust-boundary section from docs(server): clarify testController JSDoc — bridge is for upstream-proxy sellers only #1787, and the construction-time dual-emit warn from feat(server): construction-time warn when testController lacks resolveAccount (#1784) #1788 all stay as-is — they correctly describe mechanism without committing to a certification taxonomy.