update gf180 layer resistance with segment-based regression results#4228
Merged
eder-matheus merged 1 commit intoMay 13, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Arthur Koucher <arthurkoucher@precisioninno.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the resistance values for Metal layers in the GF180 platform configuration and removes the file's descriptive header. Review feedback recommends restoring the header with specific details about the data source for better maintainability and correcting a slight inconsistency in the Metal4 resistance value to match the other identical metal layers.
eder-matheus
approved these changes
May 13, 2026
6c587df
into
The-OpenROAD-Project:master
7 of 8 checks passed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Correlation Data
Mode: segment
Designs (6): aes, aes-hybrid, ibex, jpeg, riscv32i, uart-blocks
OR Version: 390e0d62
Units: R [kΩ/μm], C [pF/μm]
The resistance values that we were using weren't actually precise. Probably something off with the net-based regression script. The resistance fits obtained with new segment-based regression have perfect (1.00) R².
I cleaned up the setRC.tcl script so that the data w.r.t. the correlation is tracked here rather than having comments in the file. I also removed the comments with redundant tech data.
Metal1 is not used for routing on gf180 so there's no data for that layer.