Skip to content

feat: Update release notes for SDK 11.02 J722S#706

Open
gehariprasath wants to merge 1 commit into
TexasInstruments:11from
gehariprasath:11
Open

feat: Update release notes for SDK 11.02 J722S#706
gehariprasath wants to merge 1 commit into
TexasInstruments:11from
gehariprasath:11

Conversation

@gehariprasath
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Update the release notes and the kernel performance metrics for the SDK 11.02 J722s specific release.

@StaticRocket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

StaticRocket commented May 13, 2026

Now hold on, you can't just remove all the non-j722s related information. Jacinto decided they wanted to be special and have one overview page for all their platforms. If you're going to add the information for J722S you'll have to append it to the existing doc.

This also goes for the performance data.

@uditkumarti
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@StaticRocket

you can't just remove all the non-j722s related information.
not sure , what you are referring to .
This release is specific to J722s, then why to add other platforms.

@StaticRocket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The 11 branch is an LTS at this point. It's for all platforms. The fact that this platform is getting a late release doesn't not change the intention of the whole branch.

@uditkumarti
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Well changes are in J7 specific files, not for all platform
Second, RC13 for which this documentation is, tested only on J722S platform.
When 11.2.1 release will be rolled out, platform information and report willl be updated on which tests ran and report generated

@gehariprasath
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

The 11 branch is an LTS at this point. It's for all platforms. The fact that this platform is getting a late release doesn't not change the intention of the whole branch.

Hi @StaticRocket , what's the expectation here ? My previous PR (which I raised against master by mistake) had all platforms included which raised questions like justification to include non J722S platforms. Hence I had to resort to keeping only the J722S which made sense to me.

@StaticRocket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

which raised questions like justification to include non J722S platforms

There can be a discussion on whether or not the other platform information should be refreshed in this PR, but we shouldn't simply drop all the other platforms. Sorry if I missed that in the first thread.

Update the release notes and the kernel performance metrics for the SDK
11.02 J722s specific release.

Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <gehariprasath@ti.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@StaticRocket StaticRocket left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is admissible. In the future I hope we can fully split up this j7 family stuff to prevent these larger patches over small content updates.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@uditkumarti uditkumarti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since you making J722S specific files,
then if-def for other devices can be remoeved

Comment thread source/devices/J722S/linux/_Release_Specific_QSG.rst
Comment thread source/devices/J722S/linux/index.rst
Comment thread source/devices/J722S/linux/Release_Specific_Migration_Guide.rst
| Description | Config File | Supported yocto build machine |
+====================================================+=====================================+================================+
| |__SDK_FULL_NAME__| : 11_00 Release | processor-sdk-linux-11_00_10_01.txt | |__SDK_BUILD_MACHINE__| |
+----------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+--------------------------------+
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

11_00_10_01 Please check this version

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@gehariprasath gehariprasath May 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@uditkumarti from where to we get this revision ?

Comment thread source/devices/J722S/linux/Release_Specific_Release_Notes.rst
Comment thread source/devices/J722S/linux/Release_Specific_Release_Notes.rst
Comment thread source/devices/J722S/linux/Release_Specific_Release_Notes.rst
Comment thread source/devices/J722S/linux/Release_Specific_Release_Notes.rst
Comment thread source/devices/J722S/linux/Release_Specific_Release_Notes.rst
Comment thread source/devices/J722S/linux/Release_Specific_Release_Notes.rst
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants