Update to 26.1, migrate to Mojang mappings #34
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
Thanks for the PR, this will save a bit of time. I am going to hold off merging + releasing this until we have merged the Fabric API PR to rename its APIs to be more inline with Mojangs names. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently wanting to use this in my own mod and wanted to work on it within the snapshots (especially due to the unobfuscation + Fabric API being available for these unobfuscated snapshots), so decided to just PR this in as well because why not, nothing's really different other than no longer being obfuscated and being Mojang mapped.