Skip to content

chore: 🔖 update package version to 0.2.0#11

Merged
faizanazim11 merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
add-async-capabilities-for-memory-databases
Sep 17, 2025
Merged

chore: 🔖 update package version to 0.2.0#11
faizanazim11 merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
add-async-capabilities-for-memory-databases

Conversation

@faizanazim11
Copy link
Contributor

@faizanazim11 faizanazim11 commented Sep 17, 2025

This pull request updates the version of the mem-db-utils package to reflect recent changes.

  • Version bump:
    • Increased the package version from 0.1.0 to 0.2.0 in pyproject.toml to indicate a new release.

Closes #2

@faizanazim11 faizanazim11 self-assigned this Sep 17, 2025
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings September 17, 2025 17:32
@faizanazim11 faizanazim11 added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 17, 2025
@faizanazim11 faizanazim11 linked an issue Sep 17, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Add async capabilities for memory databases #2
Closed
Copilot AI reviewed Sep 17, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request updates the package version from 0.1.0 to 0.2.0 to indicate a new minor release of the mem-db-utils package.

  • Version bump from 0.1.0 to 0.2.0 in package configuration

@faizanazim11 faizanazim11 merged commit 9018334 into master Sep 17, 2025
1 check passed
@faizanazim11 faizanazim11 deleted the add-async-capabilities-for-memory-databases branch September 17, 2025 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code review Copilot Copilot left review comments

Assignees

@faizanazim11 faizanazim11

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add async capabilities for memory databases

2 participants

@faizanazim11